• danisth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Firefox a few years ago would kill my Mac battery in a couple hours, now it’s as good as safari for energy management. No reason not to use it as a daily driver now.

          • Banzai51@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not only that, they had goals beyond just a browser. They wanted to create a whole OS ecosystem integrated with the browser. They released Firefox as a side project to just get a browser in everyone’s hands while they worked on Mozilla. Turns out the OS ecosystem in a browser was a bust, and Firefox was a winner. Just the Mozilla devs haven’t stopped being bitter about it. The old Netscape motivations around the project have been a boat anchor.

            • pungunner@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean didn’t they achieve that? Today a lot of things are web based. Firefox is a powerful browser. Especially on Android. So if you want you can have your OS in a browser thingy…

      • Cornelius@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meh, I’ll be honest and say that I’m not impressed by chrome in modern day. While I hate Microsoft, edge is a nicer browser to use than chrome, and that’s saying something

        • Justaregulardude2001@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree, but I think that the normies like to use Chrome because… that’s what everyone is using, so I am eager to see how FF can give a better experience to the normal user.

          • 🧋 Teh C Peng Siu Dai@lemmy.worldB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Normies (also me) use Gmail, it’s easy when you login to your browser and you’re partially already authenticated everywhere else.

            Same goes for android.

            • Riskable@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              it’s easy when you login to your browser and you’re partially already authenticated automatically sending your personal, private information everywhere else.

              FTFY

              • TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re correct, but the majority of normies don’t care. A lot of people don’t naturally feel a strong impulse towards privacy, so the fact that Google knows everything about them doesn’t really bother them.

      • arglebargle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It already does. I dislike using Chrome. Firefox works better, looks better, and containers are really useful to me.

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll stick to Safari. I don’t trust Mozilla any more than Google or Microsoft.

      • RandomVideos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, an open source popular browser that is made by a nonprofit organization is less trustworthy than a close source browser made by a public company

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          An open source organization with a track record of dubious user-hostile behavior.

          Example one

          Example two

          Apple does not add plugins to my browser without my consent, nor do they show ads in my browser.

        • kimpilled@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you’re running Safari, you’re already running their OS. If Apple wants to spy on you, they’ve already got the means to do so, so you’ve already decided to trust them.

          Switching to Chrome or Firefox means trusting one more entity in addition to Apple. This expands your possible exposure.

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because with Apple I’m the paying customer, not the product being sold.

          • TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re always both. With Apple, it doesn’t sell your data, but it does sell curated ad space where they use your data to power their tools. While this is less of an invasion of privacy than Google or the atrocity of Meta’s privacy policy, it still exists on a spectrum of how much companies are willing to use your data for extra profit. I’m not saying to not use Apple, hell I’m currently using Microsoft Edge, but I think it’s important to understand that literally every profit-driven company is subject to the same systemic flaws and none of them can be completely trusted.