I’ve read an article which describes how to simulate the close ports as open in Linux by eBPF. That is, an outside port scanner, malicious actor, will get tricked to observe that some ports, or all of them, are open, whereas in reality they’ll be closed.

How could this be useful for the owner of a server? Wouldn’t it be better to pretend otherwise: open port -> closed?

  • nous@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Its costs him time - which is the point. They would have to do more detailed checks on every port which costs them time. Attackers are typically scanning loads of ports over large ranges of IPs, any small slow down on each can drastically slow down their overall progress making the attack less feasible and more expensive to undertake.

    • sapporo@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      but an attacker isn’t obliged to take on all the open ports, he could work with some of them - the ones that may seem the most interesting to him

      • dnick@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s probably a majority of the point. Falsely report that some interesting ports are open and he’ll spend time on them and potentially trigger alerts or blocks.

        Fake open ports aren’t something a normal user would bother with or understand, but with all the tools available in the nefarious side, it makes sense to have options that make their job harder if you’re willing to use them.