The Chinese studio granted early access on the condition that topics like “feminist propaganda” and “Covid-19” go unmentioned. What followed is the Streisand effect in full force.

“I feel that it only served to bring more attention on Game Science’s culture of sexism,” linktothepabst says. “All they had to do was let the game speak for itself, but it came off, to me, like an own goal, effectively stoking the flames between the people who were using this game as weapon against ‘wokeness in games’ and those who can level-headedly either enjoy the game and criticize GS or just ignore the game altogether.”

It’s the Streisand effect in full force: Try to hide something, and it becomes all the more visible. “Nobody was going to bring up Chinese politics unprompted,” Zhong says, “but the topic was there as soon as they released those guidelines.”

  • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are two genders: male and political.

    To people who want the status quo to exist forever (spoiler alert: it won’t), anything other than strict conformity to the status quo is political. But that conformity, itself, is not a political position, because it is ‘normal’.

    They pick a side, then they pretend it’s not even a side at all.

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the part that annoys me. If you want to avoid politics in a space, not “take sides,” (say, as a business owner) I totally get it. However, if you allow A to be said but somebody engaging with that is “too political” or “rocking the boat” you’re very much picking a side - You’re allowing speech A but censoring speech B. Thats the definition of taking a side lmao.