• obbeel@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m sorry, but it’s a private messaging app! Not even the owners are supposed to know what is going on in the chats. It’s not a moderation situation - I don’t know if he rejected a request to ban accounts, but it isn’t how things are supposed to be.

    • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Isn’t the main problem that most people don’t use the E2E encrypted chat feature on Telegram, so most of what’s going on is not actually private and Telegram does have the ability to moderate but refuses to (and also refuses to cooperate)?

      Something like Signal gets around this by not having the technical ability to moderate (or any substantial data to hand over).

      • Hubi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Exactly. Telegram has a ton of public channels full of content that is illegal in most EU countries and refuses to comply with any local laws on things like hate speech. They know perfectly well what their platform is used for, they just don’t care. It would be a wildly different case if everything were E2E encrypted by default.