Which - to me - is a good thing.

Do not know what downvotes are.

// image title: a lemmy post which shows a multiple of comments in regards to its upvotes/downvotes

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      2 months ago

      100% agree.

      I configure my editor to use 3 space characters per tab. I’ve worked with people who prefer tabs represented as 2 or 8 or just about any number. But I can look at the same code as them worth my preferred look.

      Also works best for line length restrictions. A tab is a single character and always is.

  • halvar@lemm.eeEnglish
    7·
    2 months ago

    For me it’s categorizing radical ideologies correctly. I just hate people throwing around buzzwords, calling anyone a communist/fascist they disagree with. Those words have meanings. You can actually be worse then the fascists and still not be one, it’s not impossible. You can still be hated for that, but you didn’t automatically become one, because you are right-wing and coincidentally an asshole. But the moment someome calls you a fascist, while you’re just an asshole, their opinon automatically becomes invalid and wrong.

  • Andrew@piefed.socialEnglish
    6·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, it’s the strange thing about engaging post titles - people seem to be so busy answering them, they ‘forget’ to also upvote them. In contrast, a meme that’s funny but about which there’s not much to say, is more likely to get an upvote as some kind of compensation for the lack of discussion.

  • solrize@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    2 months ago

    I turned off vote display and rarely miss seeing the votes. See also Facebook Demetricator.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.mlEnglish
    41·
    2 months ago

    Downvotes without any response: This is unpopular with this community, but probably correct.

    Downvotes with responses: This was either contentious or wrong.

    1 upvote, 0 downvotes, 10+ responses: You posted something really dumb, and Hexbear found out.

      • halvar@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        2 months ago

        For me it was having the audacity to state Holodomor was real, while denying it is actually a crime in my county. Looking it up it actually isn’t, but it’s widely accepted to have happened and is taught in history lessons.

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.worldEnglish
    02·
    2 months ago

    Semi-tangential. Every time I get downvoted, I move an inch closer to the exit door of this community.

    I’m talking about comments rather than posts, of course. And it should go without saying that the comments in question do not contain factual errors or even rudeness. Just pure opinion, expressed civilly.

    Downvoting is, almost always, poisonous behavior in an online community. It is just as poisonous as saying “Shut up” to someone in a real-life social situation.

    IMO the corporate social networks get this fact better than the literalist geeky types and other well-meaning idealists to be found in this forum.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.caEnglish
      1·
      2 months ago

      I heard downvotes expressed a consensus that a comment or post does not hold value in the context of that community. It’s not “shut up” but more “well that’s not relevant”.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        2 months ago

        Unsure if you’re even being serious here. The relevancy of the subject matter is not in question. The issue at hand is that people are downvoting opinions. Forgive my directness but if an opinion does not hold value in the context of the community, that seems to me just a waffly way of saying that the opinion is not welcome in the community without actually saying it.

      • lemmyingly@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        2 months ago

        Unfortunately people don’t see voting systems as a method to highlight the relavency of a contribution. They see it as a like/dislike system, and so I see as shut up signal used by most because downvoting a contribution buries it to the bottom where few people will see it.

        If it was used for relevancy and quaility then communities would be self regulating by the users. I believe Reddit’s guidelines state(s/d) it’s voting system was meant to be for relevancy, even though most people use it as a like/dislike system.

    • Fleur__@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      2 months ago

      Yeah I’m always confused by the people who are like the downvote button is for off topic discussions. Like no that’s reporting and functionally the downvote button is the “I had a negative reaction to this button” and the up vote is the “I had a positive reaction to this button”

      Personally I don’t downvote anyone because it just feels petty and pointless. Some of my favorite comments have loads of downvotes and to me it just makes whatever dumb shit I said funnier

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      Obviously my argument is being confirmed by the response to this comment. Seriously guys - I would bet that you’re all guys - you’ll regret it when you’re left with nobody to talk to but other cynics and nihilists and mindless jokers.

      • intensely_human@lemm.eeEnglish
        01·
        2 months ago

        And people like me who don’t go away just because they get downvoted.

        You can go find your community of all positive interactions, and well keep our positive/negative mix.

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      It is still important to be able to disagree publicly with people who’s opinions are just wrong, such as those saying something is trash because it is old, or not answering the asked question but instead answering some useless hypothetical about “safety”.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        2 months ago

        By community, do you mean just this particular Lemmy community or the community on Lemmy collectively? If the latter, there are other alternative Lemmy communities on other instances that may be better suited for you.

        You mean “the former”. But this is a counter-argument that dares not speak its name. My proposition is that all online communities suffer when opinions are downvoted (which is how the downvote button is overwhelmingly used), not just this community. Just as all dinner parties suffer when someone points their finger at someone else and says, “Shut up, you’re wrong”.

        • intensely_human@lemm.eeEnglish
          01·
          2 months ago

          Would a dinner party suffer if it had 10,000 people at the table and instead of saying “shut up” people could just turn the volume knob down on someone else a little, but nobody’s voice would get silenced unless more people turned the knob down on them than up?

          What if the dinner party were open invitation?

          Downvotes fold comments and sort them last. It’s signal inhibition.

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    02·
    2 months ago

    Why not just deactivate all votes. Seeing having voting makes Lemmy more like Reddit. Also deactivate all votes will help to have more discussions. Due to users can’t just downvote you and call it a day. They have to tell you why and how you’re wrong.