• Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not lying at all, omission is only a lie if it’s misleading or nefarious, this is neither.

        • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Context for a joke? Do you expect context in a Colbert monologue? I’m not sure if that makes it funnier. My point is factually correct. Its a joke, not a new york times article.

        • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I was genuinely curious about your view point. If you lack the convictions to defend your characterization of my statement, and me personally by proxy, then maybe you shouldn’t be calling me a liar with such authority.

                • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I asked you a direct question and in response you called me a liar. You impugned my integrity and I asked you to defend it. You telling me to go through your comment history is insufficient after you impugned my integrity. If you want anybody to respect your position, you need to respect other people. Otherwise, you’re just being a dick on the internet. You’re not getting anything done. You’re not changing anybody’s minds. You’re just being an asshole.