• Cy@fedicy.us.to
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I like the “book 5 | pdf: 37” part it makes it look like you’re quoting the Bible.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    the party of “small government,” once again, wants the government to police everything you do with your own junk

  • makeasnek@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you are an American and care about privacy:

    • Write your representatives. Your message can be as simple as “I care about privacy”. It’s important they know you are watching their votes.
    • Participate in elections, particularly downballot elections. Congressional makeup at the federal and state level matters a lot more for these kinds of things than who is president. Many recent laws like “right to repair” etc have happened at the state level since you can bypass federal congressional gridlock.
    • Participate in primaries. Most Americans do not vote, most voters do not vote in primaries. If you don’t like having to choose “the lesser of two evils”, primaries give you much much more choice to express your preferences. As a primary voter, you have an outsized influence on the electoral system and can help determine the options other people get to choose from.
    • Donate to PACs and non-profits working to protect your right to privacy. The EFF is an awesome non-profit. One benefit of donating to PACs is that they keep an eye on races across the country and help find and fund candidates who will advanced privacy legislation.
    • “Vote with your dollar” when you buy things. In many cases, your purchasing power outweighs the political power of your vote.
    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      No, like Prohibition, everyone will keep some around, and the laws will only be enforced against non-whites, non-Christians and uppity women. Oh and gays are right out.

  • uzi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Project 2025 is 100% political and partisan. Due to that, there are false claims being made about Project 2025.

    I condem the organization but not all statements are true due to it’s entirely political nature.

    • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What part of “Pornography should be outlawed” don’t you understand. That also entails owning and viewing porn.

      • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Outlawed isn’t equal to prison, it could be just a penalty fee, so it’s not like if you see pornography you will go to jail like OP make it look.

        Wokie sensationalism not too much different than west media propaganda tbh.

        • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          So, why should people be fined for watching porn? Why does christian puritan views be pushed to everyone? Party of small government my ass.

          “It’s not that bad” isn’t good enough. Why is that there, at all? Why should I somehow deserve to be in prison?

          • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I believe it’s not for christian purities why some people are pushing this kind of stuff, I believe it’s more related to psychological effects, social relations and objectivation of people stuff.

        • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Holy fucking shit how have you not learned to shut your dumb redneck mouth after being downvoted of every one of your last 100 comments.

      • tourist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sending nudes to your partner counts as production and distribution of pornography

        This obviously deserves the death penalty