• stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why would that be a section 230 violation? That only means the providers are not legally responsible for user content.

    • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s the argument a lot of politicians are making, that once platforms start curating user generated content they become responsible for it despite section 230. I think it’s bullshit, but it is the argument being made.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah it’s bs. Congress can change that, perhaps a court could make changes. Anything happening now is just fine and any changes would only affect the future.