• Anamana@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imo it should be a choice whether we are tracked for monetary gains or not, and not a necessary evil. But with most basic services/devices you are not even presented with that choice. E.g. by buying a phone.

    And if you do have a choice, sometimes accessibility is restricted so much that you can’t participate in our networked society.

    I think we have to find ways to provide access to the most basic services with a minimum of tracking. Anything else should still be an option of course.

    How to achieve this? I don’t know. But EU regulations certainly wouldn’t hurt for now.

    • Wayward@compuverse.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree it should be a choice. But at the moment now, it’s not. And there’s content and entertainment I get out of it that I can’t replace with other options.

      I pay for it as well. The AdBlocking options I use on my other devices aren’t as easy to implement in others (like SmartTVs or in YouTubes own app), and YouTube ads are worse than websites page ads in a lot of cases, so it’s worth it at the moment.

      Since I’m already neck deep in their services for Gmail, drive, etc at the moment, there’s no benefit from distancing myself from YouTube. I’m working on transitioning to either self hosted (which is fine for a calendar or a shared drive, I don’t care if they’re down for maintenance/failure) or privacy focused alternatives, like ProtonMail, I’m currently testing it to see if I like it before I debate if it’s worth the coin.