• volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    A people’s liberation event in 50 years is really all you pro-US-imperialists have to point to as for how evil and militaristic china is. You guys are laughable.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Please do not make personal attacks like that. They violate community rules (rule 5) and you have no idea what my politics are. I am just challenging your claim that China is not expansionist by showing that they literally expanded their borders by a massive amount within living memory.

      I’m sorry facts anger you, but they’re still facts even if they disagree with your political worldview.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          Was China bigger or smaller after taking over Tibet? I think you know the answer is bigger.

          Making your country bigger would be doing what with it? I think you know the answer is expanding it.

          And I doubt I’m making you laugh or you wouldn’t be making personal attacks.

          • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            You’re just showing you don’t understand basic concepts. You called China’s liberation of Tibet “colonialism”, proving you don’t know the meaning of it. Expansionism isn’t “when borders grow at any time in history”, it’s a tendency of a nation to view its territorial expansion as a desirable goal for the sake of it or for access to resource for example. Austria building an embassy in Tibet would grow Austria’s borders, technically counting as expansionism according to you. You have lib level of politics knowledge and analysis, and it’s hysterical how you try to bend definitions to make things look good for US imperialism

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              So Tibet wasn’t a desirable goal and didn’t give China access to resources? They just did it out of pure altruism?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The U.S. stopped expanding its borders with various Pacific islands in the 1940s. I assume you still consider them expansionist.