Over the past one and a half years, Stack Overflow has lost around 50% of its traffic. This decline is similarly reflected in site usage, with approximately a 50% decrease in the number of questions and answers, as well as the number of votes these posts receive.

The charts below show the usage represented by a moving average of 49 days.


What happened?

  • QHC@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    How is that practically different from a user perspective than answers on SO? Either way, I still have to try the suggested solutions to see if they work in my particular situation.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      At least with those, you can be reasonably confident that a single person at some point believed in their answer as a coherent solution

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Better than knowing there’s some possibility that the answer was generated purely because the sequence of characters had the highest probability of convincing the reader that it seems correct based on the sequence of characters it was given as input (+/- a decent amount of RNG)