• Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    IIRC the reason they don’t do e2e encryption is because you can access the information from the desktop without having access to the phone, you cannot do that with whatsapp, every desktop connection must pass through the phone, and that’s mighty annoying.

    Yeah, you need to trust them that they will save the data in their servers in a secure way, but they have not betrayed the users’ trust since they are running, and several people trust them.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, the fact that telegram normal/group chats are not encrypted is not true either. I think I know how is signal doing it, and I wish telegram upgraded it’s services, but for now it’s without any kind of doubt the most seamless chat service I have ever used, with the integrations, stickers and all that. I’ll give signal a try though, GL moving all the friend group chats though.

        • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          > Well, the fact that telegram normal/group chats are not encrypted is not true either.

          It’s not encrypted in any way that actually matters.

          > it’s without any kind of doubt the most seamless chat service I have ever used, with the integrations, stickers and all that.

          Yeah stickers are not high up on my list of priorities.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, for starters, Signal doesn’t have a web version so I cannot use it in managed pcs, bummer. In any case, I’ll check it out but I highl doubt that the user experience will be even close.