• Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Someone left me a reply just yesterday with that date format. At first I was going to reply back that they must have made a typo, but then realized they weren’t wrong. Ouch.

    • running_ragged@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I started a sentence in my class with “When I was born”. A student instantly chimed in and said “What in the 19’s?” And I thought in my head, of course you idiot, everybody is born in the 19’s. It still haunts me

      It still feels wrong to me, to see it written out, but spoken its different.

      I feel like it works to go with say, the 1600’s, which I read naturally as the 16 hundreds. But when I see 1900 I read that as the nineteen naughts, (aughts?) because so often when people are referring to periods in the 19 hundreds, its down to the decade because so much changed between each one. Or maybe I just felt that way because I’m so old now.

      Maybe in another 25 years, it’ll be far enough away that 1900’s becomes 19 hundreds in my head.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I’ve heard the nineteen naughts before, but more often that point of history was described as the turn of the century, or at least it was in the late 19s. Now turn of the century could mean 20 some years ago too. I wonder if people living in the early 1900s had this problem when discussing the early 1800s?