• NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So the bar for you is generally knowing a non-zero amount of things about mental disorders but for others in this thread it’s having to know the person from the article?

    Setting yourself up for an easy win by default there, smart. What’s not smart is apparently assuming you’re the only one in this thread that is even faintly familiar with mental disorders and therefore others must bow to your subjective opinion.

    You don’t have to know any particular person to know that having a mental disorder doesn’t magically un-asshole them or shield them from all criticism; origin from disorder is an explanation, not an excuse. I know I’d never expect, or frankly want, anyone to suffer my presence if one of my many oddities caused them some kind of significant distress.

          • NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            45 minutes ago

            Not everything has an answer and not everything needs to be answered. Given that you think subjective opinion is either objectively right or wrong, it’s incredibly obvious that the idea that someone would give opinion for consideration rather than argument is lost on you.

            Your idea that mental disorders, and one’s opinion of it, constitutes a personality might have something to do with it.