• deikoepfiges_dreirad@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Are people here reading the whole mastodon thread?

    it is 200% okay to bully them into submission

    Sounds rather toxic, and also counterproductive.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The person doing free labor and providing open source software doesn’t use the preferred vocabulary… Still a net positive, no reason to brigade their issue tracker for wrong think.

    Encouraging the internet to harass a volunteer is low.

    Nothing stopping people from forking the project changing the vocabulary, and maintaining their fork. But that’s more work than drive by hate

  • Celestus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s pretty stupid of the developer to have that attitude. I think it’s equally as stupid to advocate against using a piece of software because of that, though

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think he misinterpreted it as a complaint made on political grounds, when it seems to have been made on the grounds of perfectionism.

      • immutable@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not really perfectionism just grammar

        I think the fact that using a neuter pronoun is so charged that we can’t even speak or write our language correctly is insane.

        I’ve written thousands of technical documents, if you are referring to a generic operator / user / whatever the correct term to use is “they.” That’s how you say “the person that I’m referring to that I don’t know anything about”

        There was a brief madness in the 90s when fucking morons used “he/she” for absolutely no reason.