The amount going to Humble is the most, even the the Humble slider is the lowest.

  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    To cite them:

    Our mission is to support charity while providing awesome content to customers at great prices.

    Their first and thus apparently most important reason for doing all this is “to support charity”.

    If we go by the screenshot alone, it’s $12 of which only $0.60 goes to a charity. Which is 5%. Compared to $3.60 or 30% for Humble. I’m not gonna include the developer’s fee because the developer is not the one claiming they’re doing it for charity - they’re obviously doing it for the money first and foremost.

    Sure, more than nothing, but taking 30% is shady enough, IMO.

    • Draces@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It seems steam also takes 30% but doesn’t give a choice to reallocate more to the charity or humble. Seems really weird to me to be upset with a company that, at it’s worst, takes the same cut as the industry leader

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s all about the intent. Steam is there to sell you games. Humble is there to support charities while giving you cheap stuff. In their description the charities are the first thing that gets mentioned. And then they give them 5% of the money.

        • Draces@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s the opposite of Rose tinted glasses? How much do you want them to take? Would it be good if they didn’t set the default high enough to stay in business and there was no charitable option? What do you want them to do? I really can’t understand how you’re so negative on this and I’m self described cynical pessimist myself

          • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What do you want them to do?

            What I’d want? For them to give at least half, not measly 5%. Come on, they’re bragging about giving to charity while really not giving them 95% of their income. Like, at this point I’d rather donate the $12 to the charity myself than support yet another parasite on the donation system.

            I donate to various things regularly (mostly stuff local for my country, but some international as well from time to time), be it charity or open source projects, and I hate when everyone takes a cut out of this. But at least most of them have the decency to send most of the money further, not only 5%.

            I’m negative because I don’t see anything positive on a charity gaining $0.60 when $12 was given to the one who collects the money.

            • Draces@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That is just a wild reason to be bitter but to each their own I guess