edited from talent to job

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    ai as in AI: aircraft auto-landing and pitch levelling. near-boundary ship navigation. train/ freight logistics. protein folding. gene mapping.

    ai as in LLM/ PISS: hmmm… downlevel legalese to collegiate-, 6th-grade-, or even street-level prose. do funny abridged shorts. imo, training-wheels to some shakespearean writing is appreciated.

      • tracker@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        … and what do you think AI in this context is? A computer (or two, or three) that was programmed to perform an specialized task or function… AI is marketing-speak for algorithms, which we have been using for decades. Don’t be fooled… an LLM is not AI. (Your example is)

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    None. Sorry just my opinion.

    Look at the unemployment numbers. Tell me it’s a good idea to have less jobs.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Preface: I work in AI, and on LLM’s and compositional models.

    None, frankly. Where AI will be helpful to the general public is in providing tooling to make annoying tasks (somewhat) easier. They’ll be an assisting technology, rather than one that can replace people. Sadly, many CEO’s, including the one where I work, either outright lie or are misled into believing that AI is solving many real-world problems, when in reality there is very little or zero tangible involvement.

    There are two areas where (I think) AI will actually be really useful:

    • Healthcare, particularly in diagnostics. There is some cool research here, and while I am far removed from this, I’ve worked with some interns that moved on to do really cool stuff in this space. The benefit is that hallucinations can actually fill in gaps, or potentially push towards checking other symptoms in a conversational way.

    • Assisting those with additional needs. IMO, this is where LLM’s could be really useful. They can summarize huge sums of text into braille/speech, they can provide social cues for someone that struggles to focus/interact, and one surprising area where they’ve been considered to be great (in a sad but also happy way) is in making people that rely on voice assistants feel less lonely.

    In both of these areas you could argue that a LLM might replace a role, although maybe not a job. Sadly, the other side to this is in the American executive mindset of “increasing productivity”. AI isn’t a push towards removing jobs entirely, but squeezing more productivity out of workers to enable the reduction of labor. It’s why many technological advancements are both praised and feared, because we’ve long reached a point where productivity is as high as it has ever been, but with jobs getting harder, pay becoming worse and worse, and execs becoming more and more powerful.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was super nervous AI would replace me, a programmer. So i spent a long time learning, hosting, running, and coding with models, and man did I learn a lot, and you’re spot on. They’re really cool, but practical applications vs standard ML models are fairly limited. Even the investors are learning that right now, that everything was pure hype and now we’re finding out what companies are actually using AI well.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are a fair number of “developers” that I think will be displaced.

        There was a guy on my team from an offshoring site. He was utterly incompetent and never learned. He produced garbage code that didn’t work. However he managed to stay in for about 4 years, and even then he left on his own terms. He managed to go 4 years and a grand total of 12 lines of code from him made it into any codebase.

        Dealing with an LLM was awfully familiar. It reminded me of the constant frustration of management forcing me to try to work with him to make him productive. Excrpt the LLM was at least quick in producing output, and unable to go to management and blame everyone else for their shortcomings.

        He’s an extreme case, but in large development organizations, there’s a fair number of mostly useless developers that I think LLM can rationalize away to a management team that otherwise thinks “more people is better and offshoring is good so they most be good developers”.

        Also, enhanced code completion where a blatantly obvious input is made less tedious to input.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ll give you that one. LLMs in their current state help me write code that otherwise I would be putting off or asking someone else to do. Not because it’s hard but because I’ve done it 1000 times and I find it tedious, and I’d expect an entrylevel/jr to take it with stride. Even right now I’m using it to write some python code that otherwise I just don’t want to write. So, I guess it’s time to uplevel engineers. The bar has been raised, and not for the first time in our careers.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      AI has no emotions. AI use logics only.

      So Stockholders want = Money

      If CEO runs company and have low profits = Fired

      AI CEO Goal = Don’t get fired = Maximixe Profits

      Yay we stopped Evil Human CEO by replacing with Evil AI CEO! 🎉

          • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            How do you kill an AI when it upload itself to the internet?

            it doesn’t work like the ultron movie. i will say its easier to sabotage ai than a filthy rich human. thousands of servers running the ai and networking can’t just fly to an unknown location on a whim in its private jet.

  • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Reform tax law and get rid of 90% of the IRS. Computers could do all that shit if we simplified the system. Will never happen, though.

    • luluu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t know how serious that post is, but I don’t wanna give politics to an AI. Let’s remove the lobby (or make it so it actually consults and not corrupts) and make it so you don’t need to be a millionaire to go into politics instead.

      How about replacing the rich class with AI instead? #burntherich

      • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s serious an AI wouldn’t be taking bribes or helping it’s buddies make money. True AI if it ever becomes reality is the best chance of treating everyone equally and using resources in the best interests of everyone.

        I’m all for being governed by a real AI rather than the next greedy private school entitled jerk.

        Same goes for companies and being ethical.

        • Decoy321@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          On the flip side, there’s no reason to assume an artificial intelligence will share the same priorities as a human being.

          https://airesourcelab.com/paperclip-maximizer/

          I’m not fearmongering AI here (I, for one, welcome our future ai overlords). But we don’t really escape the issues of ethics with artificial intelligences. They’re still intelligent.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Replacing politicians with AIs actually sounds really cool. Instead of voting, you write an essay on the things you value. An AI reads all their voting base’s essays and votes in a way that predominantly aligns with their voter’s ideals. This isn’t direct or indirect democracy, it’s a totally new approach driven by mathematical averages.

      Politicians shouldn’t negotiate to get something passed. If the senate of AIs doesn’t like it, it’s unpassable, you just have to write a new bill. No tit for tat, no lobbying, no friends protecting friends. The only people in politics are the ones who write bills, and they can check to see if their bill would pass in a few minutes on a server, and that will be the actual vote because voting is reproducible behavior, then they’ll decide if they have to revise it.

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The kind of dangerous jobs where people still get payed to risk their life and health.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Anti-Cheats. Train an AI on gameplay data (position, actions, round duration, K/D, etc.) of caught cheaters and usw that to flag new ones. No more Kernel level garbage, just raw gameplay data.

    • jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s also good since it’s low stakes. I mean I’d be furious if misidentified after I paid to use the game and but at the end of the day it’s only a game.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Any body-breaking heavy labour. Emphasis on body-breaking; there’s nothing wrong with hard work, but there are certain people that believe hard work = leaving your body destroyed at 50.

    • jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeh I think people like this idea because of a kind of ironic poetic justice since it’s those guys who wanted to replace everyone else except themselves with AI, but if you think about how much you hated those uncaring bastards operating like robots just to extract an ounce of profit at whatever the human cost, imagine now actually being a robot. Also, if you ever had to deal with bullshit from those guys and resented having to grin and bear it even though you don’t think they’re particularly qualified and also know nothing about your job, imagine having to be “managed” by a fucking robot that tries to say patronising encouraging things because it’s learned the very best pattern of speech to get the behaviour it wants out of you. Admittedly at least some of the decision making might be a bit more rational, but then every now and then AI gets things totally out of wack in the strangest ways and you’ll have to just take those decisions, from a damn machine.

    • Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I get what you’re going for but I have a hard time imagining this as a good thing so long as companies are profit driven.