• FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      My theory (maybe it’s not a theory maybe it’s obvious) is that students and people in their twenties are more given to “big government” idealism because they were only recently living at home - maybe still are - where, even if they had terrible parents (maybe especially if they had terrible parents) it’s easy to believe “if only the people in charge were good everything would had been so much better”. Of course, there’s very little in even a healthy childhood that properly models the importance of “balance of power”. Parents are good parents or bad parents, but they are always “in charge” just by virtue of the dynamic between adults and children. I can see how young people end up believing it would just take a “good parent” to fix so much that’s wrong about the way things run. Unfortunately no group of adults has ever had “total” control over a country without it in some way going to total shit. Realising the reality of this is I think one of those moments when you actually grow up.

      • tomi000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        The people who could singlehandedly run a country in a good way are the ones that have the least motivation to do so.

    • infinite_ass@leminal.spaceOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      100% central planning works for schools, corporations, farms, bicycle repair shops… It works very well.

      If you think that an economy is special in this then you might want to check your sources. Consider who’s telling you that