Summary

Donald Trump’s advisers are proposing plans to end the Ukraine war that involve territorial concessions to Russia and ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine.

These proposals aim to pressure both sides into negotiations, leveraging military aid as a carrot or stick. Plans include freezing current battle lines or creating demilitarized zones.

Analysts doubt the feasibility, citing likely resistance from Ukraine, European allies, and U.S. lawmakers.

Trump’s approach reflects his campaign pledge to resolve the conflict quickly, but critics argue it risks legitimizing Russian aggression and undermining Western alliances.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    No, you see we need to fight Russia to the last drop of Ukrainian blood. Every Ukrainian man, woman, and child must be sacrificed and the whole of Ukraine sold for scrap then reduced to toxic, landmine-ridden wastes, unfit for human habitation.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Giving Ukraine the necessary arms doesn’t force them to keep fighting.
      It just allows them to decide when they want to stop.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          That’s true in every war ever. Still, Ukraine is a sovereign nation. The Russian talking point that “The West” is fighting Russia to the last Ukrainian man is nonsense.
          Ukraine is fighting, and the Ukrainian government decides how long.

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              hmm, I wonder who represents the will of the Ukrainian people in your opinion…
              and knows what’s best for them…
              and is trying his hardest to liberate the country from its democratically elected government, so the people can finally live in Russia I mean Freedom!

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                22 days ago

                Russia being shit doesn’t make the other country run by a billionaire who sold its state assets for pennies on the dollar and sent an entire generation to die in a meatgrinder good.

                That war (between capitalist powers) is bad for the people and good for oligarchs shouldn’t be a controversial take.

            • perestroika@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              failed to end the civil war,

              It’s not a civil war if “separatists” get weekly weapons, fuel and food convoys from Russia, and the whole thing was started by GRU agents, and requires thousands of Russian troops. That was the case approximately from 2014 to 2022. I have a prejudice against people who refer to the Russian-backed insurgency in Eastern Ukraine as a “civil war”. It typically tells of which information sources they prefer and consume.

              A prolonged war is the absolute worst case scenario for the people living in Ukraine and former Ukrainian territories

              Every war is prolonged as long as armies are willing and able to fight, and politicians don’t make peace.

              The easiest way to get a sustainable peace is simple: Putin needs to withdraw troops from Ukraine. Alas, he’s not in the mood - not yet. But he regularly orders polls and reads results, and has some understanding of how Russia’s economy is doing. He could be in the mood within a year.

              Compared to supporting Ukraine through another year of fighting to obtain a lasting peace at acceptable terms (ideally: internationally recognized borders), making an unstable and unjust peace by undermining Ukraine (so they’d cave in and agree to an unjust peace in the minimum amount of time) might not be the best option.

              Unfortunately it looks that Trump is going to try exactly that. And there’s hardly anyone in the US who can alter the outcome. Other members of NATO can alter the outcome however, by (almost) doubling their support.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              22 days ago

              nothing Russia might do is worse than the millions displaced, livelihoods destroyed, hundreds of thousands dead that we’re seeing

              The millions displaced, livelihoods destroyed, hundreds of thousands dead is BECAUSE RUSSIA CHOSE TO INVADE.

              Removed for misinformation/Russian propaganda.