Is asking not to sell data the same as asking not to track it?

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oh yeah let’s bash on Firefox again for some reason while ignoring everyone else

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Unfortunately, the old Do Not Track setting worked on the honor system. Since when have advertisers ever worked on the honor system?

    • PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Once Microsoft enabled it by default in IE/Edge that was the end of it. The whole point was to be an opt-in.

      Ironically it was also used as another data point for fingerprinting users. It was a nice idea in theory but it just wasn’t gonna work.

  • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Really incredibly disheartening that Firefox sold out. We really can’t have anything nice.

    • Bezier@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      DNT was useless because you’re only kindly asking to not be tracked. No advertiser respects it, because they don’t have to. It actually has the opposite effect, because another data point just helps them narrow you down for better tracking.

      I don’t like where FF is going, but calling them out for this is disingenuous.

    • Elsie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Using something that tells ad servers “hey please don’t track me” and have it disabled by default for most browsers is really just another easy fingerprinting mechanism.