• sizeoftheuniverse@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I dont think the Dev who has the blog is unaware of DAG, he usually deal with CS stuff, i believe he was trying to make a point.

      But who knows what he knows or doesn’t know, i am not his lawyer. In any case, there are a few valid points.

      I never understood the hype behind gradle.

      • the_sisko@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        They probably know what it is, but it’s a bad point if they’re trying to paint DAGs as esoteric CS stuff for the average programmer. I needed to use a topological sort for work coding 2 weeks ago, and any time you’re using a build system, even as simple as Make, you’re using DAGs. Acting like it’s a tough concept makes me wonder why I should accept the rest of the argument.

        Can’t say I have a strong feeling about Gradle though 🤷‍♀️

    • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. Why would a person need to look it up when the name literally describes it. Directed? Means connections are in a single direction. Acyclic? A-cyclic = non-cyclical, doesn’t have cycles. Graph is… well a graph.

      Which part does the author think an average programmer should struggle with?