Tech CEOs want us to believe that generative AI will benefit humanity. They are kidding themselves

  • soiling@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    “hallucination” works because everything an LLM outputs is equally true from its perspective. trying to change the word “hallucination” seems to usually lead to the implication that LLMs are lying which is not possible. they don’t currently have the capacity to lie because they don’t have intent and they don’t have a theory of mind.

    • tinselpar@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Misinformation is misinformation, whether it is intentional or not. And it’s not farfetched that soon someone will launch a propaganda bot with biased training data that intentionally spreads fake news.

    • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well neither can it hallucinate by the “not being able to lie” standard. To hallucinate would mean there was some other correct baseline behavior from which hallucinating is deviation.

      LLM is not a mind, one shouldn’t use words like lie or hallucinate about it. That antromorphises a mechanistic algorhitm.

      This is simply algorhitm producing arbitrary answers with no validity to reality checks on the results. Since neither are those times it happens to produce correct answer “not hallucinating”. It is hallucinating or not hallucinating exactly as much regardless of the correctness of the answer. Since its just doing it’s algorhitmic thing.