Let’s assume that in 10 years, AI has advanced absurdly, insanely fast, and is now capable of doing everything a Senior SWE can do. It can program in 15 different languages, 95% accuracy with almost no mistakes, can create entire applications in minutes, and no more engineers or SWEs are needed… What will all the devs do? Do they just become homeless? Transition to medical field, nursing? Become tradespeople like plumbers, HVAC?

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    In this hypothetical, why would we create new languages? What benefit does that have for AI-gen code?

    So either we’re going to improve AI-gen to the point where we rely on it, or human devs are still important in which case new languages matter. The main exception here are languages specifically designed for AI, in which case error-rate would go down.

    So either AI pushes out broken code and human devs are still important, or AI doesn’t push out broken code and new languages aren’t valuable.

    • owl@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Someone still has to write the instructions. AI might not become a replacement for the engineer, but a more powerful compiler, that is still fed with code written by engineers.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah, I agree that’s the more likely scenario. People seem to worry way too much about AI, when it’s really only going to replace junior devs, and only for short-sighted companies.

        • owl@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          But I mean many people have already lost their job because AI automated it away.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            True, and many people have lost jobs because something else automated it away, like toll booth workers, grocery clerks, and telephone switchers, and computers (i.e. people who would compute things by hand).

            Jobs disappearing because technology advances is natural. It sucks for those impacted, but it’s natural, and IMO it’s only a problem of new jobs aren’t created fast enough, or whole industries disappear. Fighting to keep jobs in spite of automation runs the risk of having an entire industry disappear, such as if dock workers win the fight to prevent automation on the docks, they’ll just all lose their jobs at the same time once automation can replace them all at once.

            The better plan is to adjust and adapt as technology changes. If you’re entering CS or a recent grad, make sure you understand concepts and focus less on syntax. If you’re a mid level, learn to incorporate AI into your workflow to improve productivity. If you’re a senior, work toward becoming an architect and understand how to mitigate risks with poor quality code.

            Fighting AI will at best delay things.

            • owl@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 minutes ago

              That is certainly true. It just sucks, that so many people are scrambling for jobs and rich people get richer. There has to be a better way.

    • hex@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think both can happen at the same time. There’s a lot of fkn nerds out there. (I’m a software developer myself)