Honestly this is absurd. These death machines shouldn’t be legal in europe. That thing doesn’t even fit in the parking space, even though the parking lot has the biggest spaces in the whole city. The Golf Polo is so small in comparison, it could even hide in front of the engine hood of the truck.

EDIT: It’s a Polo and not a Golf, I don’t know my cars, sorry for that!

    • Shieldtoad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      A percussionist I know has a double cab van, I think it’s a Ford transit. It can haul 3 timpani, a drum, tubular bells, a bass drum and other smaller stuff all in one trip. And then it still has space for 5 people. Try doing that with a pick-up.

      • KlavKalashj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a bass player, a VW Touran can fit two double basses and two people. Can’t do that in a pick-up.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those are roughly the same size as a 150 though, aren’t they?

        Why is a behemoth of a van OK, but an equal sized pickup isn’t?

        • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because pick-ups are truly unfit for purpose unless the purpose is to increase your confidence and sense of safety on the road. We are always gonna need utility vehicles for specific purposes. A percussionist is not hauling drums on the train.

    • UnfortunateDoorHinge@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you forklift a pallet from the side? Nope the tub design doesn’t allow it unless you have a tray design.

      Can you load a large ladder on it? No ladder/timber rack.

      Is it good off-road? Perhaps, but the tub design over the rear tyres and back bumper make the departure angle poor, you’ll need rock sliders or a lift.

      I think I’ll stick to wagons and vans.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Show me how you transport a ton of gravel in your car please (and remember, a ton is more than the towing capacity of the vast majority of cars, so no cheating!)

      • gamermanh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The places around me will deliver it for quite cheap so the uh, 2 times in my life I need that I’ll just do that?

        How often does the average person haul tons of earthen materials around?

          • gamermanh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Professional delivery truck with a lifting bed to slide the earth off the back easily wherever you ask them to

            A specialized vehicle, not a crappy pickup truck

          • legion02@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            Never a pickup truck, that’s for sure. Usually a tilt bed truck in my experience. Not something you’d generally want to drive unless you’re moving gravel.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In my case multiple times a year… plus construction material, furniture, motorcycles… In the end I need to haul heavy shit multiple times a month.

          Yet, people would take pictures of my SUV and call me an idiot with no respect for driving a big vehicle… With a 4 cylinders that has a fuel consumption that’s the same (or better) as AWD cars that these same people don’t criticize???

          • n3m37h@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            With a 4 cylinders that has a fuel consumption that’s the same (or better) as AWD cars that these same people don’t criticize???>

            The fuck you talking about?

            More weight = more gas needed to move said vehicle… how can this be possible? Unless your making shit up.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              All highway, 8.2L/100km, mixed, 9.5L/100km.

              AWD cars with similar power (so mostly V6) are higher than that, even more so if I include towing capacity in the comparison.

            • sphericth0r@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just do a little bit of research into the fuel efficiency of various sized vehicles, the correlation is not direct and some larger vehicles get better gas mileage than smaller vehicles strictly due to efficiency. A small inefficient motor and a large efficient motor may yield the same mpg, but the large efficient motor is extracting more power from the same fuel source. And that’s not even getting into diesel versus gasoline…

              • n3m37h@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Some being they key word here. Those specific vehicles were built with effency in mind. Now take the Ford F150 being the most common truck in Canada / USeh and I’d bet not a single one will be more efficient than a 6 cylinder AWD car. Your argument is kinda moot as your looking at outliers.

          • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think its fair if people call you an idiot for buying an SUV to haul shit - there are far better vehicles for the job.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes, better drive a truck instead of taking my trailer with me just when it’s necessary, so I take more space and have worse fuel economy 👍

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a small trailer. Towing capacity of my 2003 Subaru WRX is 1500 lbs. So I guess two trips? Truth be told, that’s why I have the trailer. For when I need to move a decent volume of random crap for work.

        I don’t think the people here are complaining about pickups when used for work, but they are shit vehicles for daily driving. And, this is my personal opinion, crew cabs are usually not utilized to transport workers. More than not, I expect they are because they think they’ll take the family or kids in it. Even then they usually drive without any passengers.

        I get that a lot of workers don’t want to have two vehicles, but pickups are not good daily drivers.