• BigNote@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is because the Internet killed journalism’s revenue model. In the past a big metro daily had three main revenue streams; subscriptions, newsstand sales and classifieds/advertising. Newsstand sales is the only leg that didn’t get gutted by the internet, so in order to keep it viable, they have to charge more than they used to, but even then, it’s just not really cost efficient and many major metro dailies no longer print a hard copy version.

    One problem with journalism is that since everyone consumes it in one way or another, everyone imagines that they have an informed opinion about it, but unless you went to j-school and/or have worked in the field, you probably don’t.

    • demlet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work for a plant that prints local papers. They are an invaluable source of local news, and you are correct, the internet is slowly killing them. It’s a real loss for civic engagement. People really need to pay attention to what’s happening locally. National stories are sexier, but we actually have much more control over what happens in our own neighborhoods and towns.

      • Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But what keeps a local newspaper from creating an online service over which the papers can be bought, maybe even for a lower price because manufacturing costs are no longer extant?

        • demlet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are all trying. I’m honestly not sure yet whether it will work. I hope so.