Please state in which country your phrase tends to be used, what the phrase is, and what it should be.

Example:

In America, recently came across “back-petal”, instead of back-pedal. Also, still hearing “for all intensive purposes” instead of “for all intents and purposes”.

  • mkhopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    43 minutes ago

    “Seen”.
    Holy fuck, “seen”.

    I honestly think that using this word incorrectly has gotten worse over the last few years. Hearing someone say, “yeah, I seen her yesterday” just makes me want to punch the wall.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 hour ago

    i feel like we should be able to beat the living shit out of people intentionally spreading political misinformation.

    Like im sorry, this may not meet instance rules, or whatever, but like, holy fuck, the amount of shit you can just lie about, without people asking question, kneecaps should’ve happened years ago, what the fuck are we doing bro.

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Saying the quiet part out loud.”

    Saying things out loud is how you say them.

    It’s “saying the quiet part loud.”

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    One thing is different from another, not than. One thing differs from another. It’s different from the other thing.

    Although in the UK it’s “different to” for some reason.

  • cokeslutgarbage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Idk if this counts as a phrase, but on the internet, people talk about their pets crossing the rainbow bridge when they die. That’s not how the rainbow bridge poem goes. Pets go to a magnificent field when they die. They are healed of all injury and illness. When you die, they find you in the field and you cross the bridge together. It’s much sweeter the way it was written than the way people use it.

  • bitchkat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s always going to be the “of” people. Its “would have”, “should have” etc and not “would of”.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The vast majority of these issues could be solved if people a) read any halfway-decent book, b) and didn’t choose to remain willfully ignorant. It’s fine to misunderstand or just not know something. We’ve all been there, we’ll be there again. NBD. But to be shown or offered the correct way and still choose to do it wrongly? That’s not cool at all.

  • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What entitlement means vs false sense of entitlement.

    I tell people they are entitled to their rights and have an entitlement to their social security money for example, and they get offended thinking I mean “false sense of entitlement” instead.