It’s 25km/h. There is also a 45km/h category with stricter regulation.
It’s 25km/h. There is also a 45km/h category with stricter regulation.
The most hilarious example is that 80s video about snowboards… ah, here it is:
I think all propaganda is equally bad. Putting certain ones on pedestals because “At least it isn’t XYZ” doesn’t jive with me, and it distracts from the real issue.
False equivalence and whataboutism is not helping anyone.
Yeah, and they’ve also had more explicit efforts like America’s Army. That being said, while it is propaganda, it’s not quite as deceptive and pro-warcrimes as what Russia’s putting out there.
They’re a small company, they’ll probably just go bankrupt.
They weren’t normally on the same network, but were accidentally put on the same network during migration.
170 is a fairly substantial sample size, but it does pose challenges with data interpretation when there’s no intervention and the expected effect size is small.
Life sciences often uses much smaller sample sizes, but with intervention.
At the absolute minimum, the headline here should be “found no evidence of” rather than “do not”. The good old absence of evidence vs. evidence of absence thing.
That is generally true, with exceptions like leaking someone else’s private information.
But it implicates the adjacent “right to be forgotten” rather than narrowly defined “privacy”. This could be a real legal issue in the EU.
It’s not sudden, it’s been garbage for a while.