I have used both as Ubuntu flavours when I needed a lighter desktop on older hardware. XFCE was absolutely solid, worked and brought new life to the hardware. But, I wanted just a little more pizazz so, I moved to Mate. It was just as quick, felt a bit more modern but it wasn’t as rock solid as XFCE. XFCE is perfect for stability. Mate is more modern but younger so maybe not as solid. It’s been a while since I took either out for a spin though. Time to fire up the VirtualBox I suppose.
Dustwin
From Rankin Inlet, Nunavut, living in the Battlefords, Saskatchewan since 2008. Lucky to have the most amazing wife, and we have 3 wonderful daughters. An Inuk in treaty six territory. I love open source software, dabbling in graphic design and video editing, and cooking. I love the Leafs.
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 20th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
14·5 days agoRarely hear about DSL anymore, http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/
Kubuntu 24.04 because it’s a solid desktop and I have nothing against Snap. If it works then I don’t care if it’s a deb flat or snap. p PPAs were fun and exciting but I broke my system more than once with them back 10 years.
Thunder for Lemmy been solid for me since I’ve been using it.
Have we considered the snow fell in that pattern? 😲😂