

This feels like a really stupid move if they want to lock international users into US-based AI. This will just make more flock to alternatives that will catch up.
(This isn’t me being for AI but trying to understand this from the US perspective)


This feels like a really stupid move if they want to lock international users into US-based AI. This will just make more flock to alternatives that will catch up.
(This isn’t me being for AI but trying to understand this from the US perspective)


I remember it being my first search engine after seeing a tv ad for it in the 90s.
Never thought about it for about 20 years but a little sad nonetheless.


Thanks-that link doesn’t seem to be working at the moment though.
The article here seems to be implying the demographic of streaming is changing.
I was curious if it younger people (I) are shifting how they access it through piracy (what you were suggesting); (ii) it’s more of a broader shift from shows to YouTube or other types of “modern” content
Or more likely both but I was interested how much of each factor.


But is Plex that big with younger people in general?
Log scale?


I went from SF to Chicago for a few hundred dollars for a couple nights where I got my own cabin (probably 450 total — that might have been the price all the way to New York or just to Chicago, don’t remember). But I only booked about a month in advance. That was around 2019 so maybe prices have gone up radically since then?
But the long distance train experience in the US felt closer to a cruise than a sleeper train in Europe which I’m used to (all meals included, lounge carriage and so on).
So not everywhere in Europe is right wing (but there are similar trends in certain countries like the US). If the US falls, Europe will be the last stronghold for democracy (which might also fail in a few years).


Haha no. Cause I read the article before I posted my comment. I’m not spreading misinformation.
The misinformation is in the title of the article. Report the article instead of going after someone who read it, and is obviously not talking about the article seriously.
It’s funny though when someone says read the article doesn’t read the one of the top tree of comments they are replying to where I explicitly say it’s a non issue 10 hours before your comment.
Maybe you want to edit your comment.


I know. There’s an answer above where I say that. Writing a jokey comment doesn’t mean you haven’t read it.


I mean I was being a little jocular in my comment (since this tracker is on the outside) it doesn’t really matter.
But by preferring “inauthentic” I was thinking something like “Greek style cheese” which is just feta but made outside of Greece or sparking wine for champagne. So food standards still apply.
But yeah, they are trying to stop fraudulent claims.


Maybe I’m a picker eater, but I think I’d rather have an inauthentic product than eating a microchip.


Perhaps git would work?
So while the majority of the use is already in the us, it seriously limits their ability to grow and the new type of soft power that can be obtained by owning the AI systems the world uses is forfeited by the US with this action.