ok, thanks for the precision. I am interested in those projects and was looking at system76’s code. This new version is in a different repository named cosmic-epoch. I’ll dig it more.
ok, thanks for the precision. I am interested in those projects and was looking at system76’s code. This new version is in a different repository named cosmic-epoch. I’ll dig it more.
COSMIC is built from GNOME shell, it is 100% a GNOME desktop and not from scratch.
I will never understand people using 3rdparty MQ and RPC implementations. What a a PR for rocketMQ right here.
You can and you should implement your communication protocols, most of the time 3rdparties are very wasteful and a security liability. I like ZeroMQ (https://zeromq.org/), they have amazing tech guides (https://zguide.zeromq.org/). I still mostly do my own code.
I may have trust issues but sockets are not THAT hard, they’re just amzaingly frustrating to debug, not as much as debuging 3rdparty code.
I had the idea that moderation is instance based in Lemmy, mods only moderate people on their instance.
I must be missing something (I can see the community is not from lemmy.world but the guy is)
OK I got it, you are completely out of the loop here.
You do not grasp the idea of NoScript and other JS filtering extension. This is not about server code, your all arguments is baseless here.
By the way JS refered to Javascript and not NodeJS.
Anyway I got you whole company/business talk about “keeping the service available, secure, performant” and “GDPR […] bankrupting fine”… yeah lemmy.world.
Thanks for your answer.
First I don’t even grasp what a “service owner” is.
Second, for JS front-end openness there are already a bunch of app (web, android) that are open-source and secured. Everything has dependencies nowadays, this doesn’t prevent good security. Think all the python app and their dependencies, rust, android… even c\c++ packages are built with dependencies and security updates are necessary (bash had security issues).
I think with JS scripts it’s actually even easier to have good security because the app is ran in our web browser so the only possible attacker is the website we are visiting itself. If they are malicious then the close-sourced JS script is even worse. Unless you count 3rd party scripts embedded that bad dev uses in their website without even thinking about trusting them. That is also awful in both open or close source environment.
So even having imperfect security (which happens regardless to openness), who is the attacker here? I would rather run js script on my end if the code can be checked.
I believe you missed the point, I am not in defense of Security through obscurity
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity), quiet the opposite.
The point: “[…] risk for the service owner as it gives an easily parsable way for an attacker to check […]” is well known and not the discussion here. You can choose close source for ‘security’ this is opensource community so I am wondering about such a tool.
I’m losing faith of this community. It’s like far right people deniing reality and pushing weird agenda like: red eye in thumbnail so it must be wrong.
All the points that have read here aren’t addressing the content but weird stuff.
Maybe https://retractionwatch.com/2023/10/02/nobel-prize-winner-gregg-semenza-tallies-tenth-retraction/ is also wrong for you and all the rest of the world. I’m not gonna take time to answer toxic people like you who are not even trying…
It was my mistake to post this here. I take full responsibility and will not interact any more as I can see how reddit-like lemmy has become since the rise of lemmy.world. You can just ignore me or keep spitting your venom with 0 argument.
I guess you would hate every single leftist channel in France with that. Maybe I misunderstood the overall position of this community. I can see trying to address scientific fraud is frown upon here.
Yes the ads is quiet bad. I didn’t know this was a reactionary youtube channel. Do you have any information of the video content being false?
We always had. Many people wrote personal notes/letters in cryptic ways to prevent unwanted readers from deciphering it.
Imagine a word where we would teach children not to make their own cypher because this is illegal. What a distopian society.
Celeron is x86 and quiet bad at its job as far as I have always seen. Benchmark would be nice.
Spending 3000$ to assemble a PC and installing TrueNas as is not new nor informative to me. I’m not a huge fan of rich people spending thousand of dollars building a power hog a call it a nice NAS.
The post would be more interesting if, at least, it would show the assembling (not stolen photos) and the software settings. For a really interesting post I would like to see a before/after benchmark of performance and power consumption.
I don’t think any server, especially self hosting should be CISC based like x86 architecture but RISC like arm or RiSC-V. The power usage is a order of magnitude less. Also really building yourself would probably cost hundreds and not thousands of dollars.
Earlier this year we saw an increase in the number of reports we received about some people using our service in ways that we cannot tolerate. To be more clear, this was not about some people merely saying things that others disliked.
Cannot be less clear.
Anyway I don’t understand why you’d need an account. I’ve always created rooms and share the link to people to invite. You can setup a password if you want privacy. Any reason to login?
If a human has deficiencies from birth or after an accident, should they have the same rights under laws?
firefox
For me the firefox password manager is totally fine : I know where the encrypted file is and I can manually back it up and copy to an other computer ($HOME/.mozilla/firefox/[profile folder]/key4.db + logins.json). You can decrypt yourself the file easily too.
You can add a new executable in your ~/.local/bin
directory like command_custom
that would start SOME_ENV_VAR=value command
. Like if you use bash:
#!/usr/bin/bash
SOME_ENV_VAR=value command
Do not forget to chmod +x
the file to make it executable.
This way you will have additional command for your user only (no sudo require to create/update those), for system-wise command put it in /usr/local/bin
.
yes bare git works just fine. if you ever want a web GUI and/or issues and Pull Request you want such a tool.
A web GUI can be very nice to share your repository publicly. You can also use codeberg.org if you can’t or don’t want to self host.
PS : I’m kinda shocked (not that much) by the downvotes or your legitimate and polite comment. Still looking for better communities/system.