But, the answers do specify “have or raise” so adoption is also included.
But, the answers do specify “have or raise” so adoption is also included.
Haha, I honestly probably will. But no, it was to accompany a text message.
(There was a guy that looked like him and I was showing my wife because she is terrible at celebrity faces)
No one ever mentions this movie but my favorite movie is The Fountain, with Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz.
It’s basically a love story set in three timelines, with absolutely amazing music, dark storytelling, and an unbelievably satisfying ending. A lot of it is left up to interpretation but it’s not overly complicated. Cemented me as a huge fan of Aronofsky even if he’s not always a pop culture favorite.
https://imgur.com/a/beer-drinking-cat-iDHVaU6
It did not understand the assignment, but it did give me a few reasonable examples of the original prompt.
Thanks, because I bought it after it got good and I’ve put 1000+ hours into it.
I don’t think it’s an overreaction - you have a line, and when it was crossed you switched.
The difference is, Borders wasn’t creating books. They were just the middleman. It would be more like if individual publishers decided to all start their own book stores to compete with Amazon.
Transformers: touch them and you die 🎵
deleted by creator
Beautiful game
It’s ironic, at times like this you’d pray
But a bomb blew the mosque up yesterday
What would stop owners from shifting the burden to the renters?
As of right now this is already how property taxes are handled by most landlords: mortgage + tax + est. cost to fix incidentals + time managing paperwork = rent (in a fair situation - though most will tack on as much extra for “profit” as they can)
So if you have a house worth 600k (12k tax), the mortgage is $3500/mo, they would just charge $4500+ a month to cover their costs.
I think the only way is to add extremely progressive property tax to multiple ownerships, and a name always has to be attached as “owner”. So your first house and second might have limited property taxes, but your third would be double, fourth would be quadruple, fifth would be 8x etc.
That was just eShop
It was a company of 30 people, not some massive corporation. I think it’s important to differentiate between small companies and huge, faceless conglomerates.
“I’m sorry Dave…”
Dawg I am literally left as fuck - I wasn’t saying it was both sides at all. I’m saying each side individually has their own reasons for answering the question the way they did. Do you think conservatives make up more than 60% of the population?
It would be like asking “Do you think the government provides the right amount of welfare?”
Most people would say “no” because you’d have Republicans saying Gov provides too much welfare, and Democrats saying Gov doesn’t provide enough welfare.
Dropping a blanket statement like “This country is filled with idiots” is SIGNIFICANTLY more “both sides” than my point was.
God I wish I lived in a country that wasn’t so filled with idiots.
Sounds like you agree with the adults, then. That’s exactly the sentiment that’s causing this issue - no matter which side you fall on, there are conservatives who believe the education is too “woke”, and liberals that believe the education is too watered down by moneyed and religious interests. Believing the country is filled with idiots is precisely why adults in general express dissatisfaction with education.
Nah, the beef lobbies will just have the government increase subsidies. Obviously corporate profits are more important than the future of the human race.
Pretty sure it’s Jesus H Roosevelt Christ