17.5: People’s names aren’t written in camelCase
17.5: People’s names aren’t written in camelCase
It looks like a Mexico filter reshade preset ‘mod’ at best. At worst they changed the mood and time of day of a bunch of scenes and npcs potentially glow indoors now (like at 1:41)
What’s it with the growing twitter widgets nowadays?
…Google started adding links to archived websites in the Wayback Machine
They better be compensating it…
Isn’t this already a thing on Wayland?
Wage theft grindset
Mildly Europe shaped
Metaprogression
How to become a soap opera writer
They say that they don’t have a minimum speed requirement and the speedtest result doesn’t affect your application. Also considering that they specify that you choose the node geographically closest to you (instead of the lowest latency one) and the only other information in the test is latency, it does sound like they’re either looking for vpns or your location.
IP is quite unreliable when it comes to geolocation, especially if you have a dynamic ip
Their speedtest requirement also seems to be about geolocating you.
Edit: Also would anyone explain why they prefer mp3 to aac and don’t even mention ogg? And what’s the point of uploading both cbr and vbr mp3s? Isn’t it ogg>aac>mp3 vbr>mp3 cbr quality wise?
Aren’t all lights led nowadays? I don’t think the type of the light is the problem
It’s using ai image recognition and I doubt it’s the world’s first to do so.
How is the link file executing malware? Can you put any shell script as the target?
Remedy didn’t do layoffs and bought back publishing rights of control from 505 after operating at a loss last year. If this ‘loan’ lets them own their own games that’s great. It’s sad to see how many of their old titles are owned by/tied to other companies
Who’s being exploited? It’s not like the app hides its true nature until you pay. People are upset at the idea of paying it something they don’t want to but that’s a completely imaginary scenario, those who think it’s good will pay for it and those who don’t won’t. I don’t think that justifies calling the guy names and assuming how he must’ve become (or has always been) a bad person.
I’ve no idea what you mean by legitimacy of YouTube, but if you think things like this hurt it wouldn’t it help to not have a big outrage that makes it reach even more people? Let it have a quiet death and maybe the media will stop creating these weekly how-dare-you-make-a-bad-product dramas
Nintendo noticed ai exists just now and thus dodged the hype cycle
I don’t understand why the internet is unable to say “I don’t like this app, so I won’t pay for it” rather than “I don’t like this app, so you’re a bad person”. Hundreds of people raging over and catastrophising something they never bought or even heard of until now.
“individual consumption doesn’t matter” is green “your vote doesn’t matter”
Except a computer isn’t making decisions here? An investigator is making decisions, the computer is sorting the investigatees. Even if that wasn’t the case it wouldn’t be ambiguous who to blame, it’s clearly on who decided what goes into the algorithm and how it should work
Edit: even beyond who would be legally responsible, as evidenced by this article and others like it people are already holding policy makers and anti welfare instigators responsible. The fall guy being one step removed from the crime doesn’t change who made it happen