• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 13th, 2023

help-circle


  • If its only you and you want best security, setup a VPN system. (Tailscale, Netbird, or others are quite easy)
    If someone else should also, and you dont want everyone to have to use a VPN, then you can expose some services directly. Of course behind CGNat you need some third-party system to allow this (e.g. cloudflare or a rented server).

    I am not a big fan of cloudflare, they are a huge centralized company, easily allowing tracking across websites with clear-text access and kinda discouraging learning how to secure things yourself (which you have to do anyways, because you are a service provider and only cloudflare is not enough if its still publicly accessible though them)
    But in the end its your choice. They easily allow you as service provider to protect yourself from DDoS attacks or allowing IPv4 access when you are behind CGNat, things you just cannot easily do yourself, certainly not without costs.



  • This. You can also directly connect via IP address when enabled on the target, very handy.

    Its probably also one of the few which have started developing Wayland support on the host side.
    Currently only clipboard and video sharing works, mouse and keyboard are close…
    wayland is very restrictive and things like full keyboard/mouse reading/writing need special handling (and afaik a mouse write method wasnt really available from user permissions so far)


  • Find the escapees, put them on the list or find a list including them for your particular use-case.
    I dont have much things getting through, mostly small sites displaying things, so i just add a filter myself.

    Afaik Ghostery was bought and started tracking its users… or was that another popular extension? Happened to alot of these… pretty sure it was Ghostery?










  • The License is clearly not Free by imposing restrictions to e.g. commercial vs non-commertial usage or distribution. It also restricts usage of name and logo aswell as terminating the license when legal action is taken against the provider.

    While i can understand the reasoning, the license still stands against FOSS.
    I believe you could have clearly separated them as provider and the software like its done in most cases. By wanting to protect their software, they had to restrict the License, so its no longer Free to use in any form you’d want.