It is actually:

Meme - noun

1. an idea that is passed from one member of society to another, not in the genes but often by people copying it

• Other cultures have similar versions of this meme.
• the political and cultural memes of the 21st century

2. an image, a video, a piece of text, etc. that is passed very quickly from one internet user to another, often with slight changes that make it humorous

• an internet meme/a blog meme

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/meme

It’s a meme in the same sense that some SCPs are described as memetic. Being humorous is not a requirement, though it is often the intention.

Are you there universal monk?

You said intentional.

I’ll grant you that I could have phrased it more clearly, but I was speaking about the 2A for that section:

If that were the case you’d be right. But as of right now, this is the only check on their power. And it is an intentional check. The 2A was put in place to fight tyrants if it came to it, and it is quickly coming to it.

Perhaps, but if it’s ever used to support justice then it’s inevitable that it would also be used to undermine justice.

Yes, which is why it cannot simply be labeled corruption in all cases. It’s dependent on the case it’s used in. It can be used to free somebody from stealing food for their star ijg family, it can be used to let lynchers get away with their horrid actions, and everything in-between.

Why bother having laws if you can simply convene a jury of citizens to determine an appropriate punishment?

Because the majority of the time it isn’t applicable, or used. It’s an edge case.

I said inherent, not intentional.

And it’s not inherently corrupt. It can be used as a check against immoral law, or it can be used to refuse justice to just law. It’s entirely based on the case it’s used in.

Mergers should be illegal.

Once against proving we have a two tiered justice system.

IIRC the problem there is that it potentially makes you liable to be sued by the company for disclosing negative/private information. But they can’t exactly hold you liable if you’re dead, so if you’re dead you may as well speak what you know from beyond the grave.

Absolutely. I was gonna edit my comment to include that but you beat me to the punch.

If the cops did indeed plant evidence then happy days for the defence since it should be easy to disprove. e.g. by simple handwriting analysis or other such means. But this is fantasy wishful thinking since he did write the words. So stick to the reality here

Handwriting analysis is hardly objective.

He shot the guy and confessed to it.

He’s pleaded not guilty, and unless you have more up to date information, he’s made no confession outside of the alleged note.

While it won’t help you getting suicided, setting up a deadman’s switch on the cloud that will release your testimony is definitely worth doing.

Geneally, you don’t become a CEO without being a shitty person, and therefore a shitty parent.

The mechanism is irrelevant. Murder is still murder even if through insurance denials, pollution, or any other bullshit legal ways of killing people.

I’m all for it, though does anybody know a good place to find these unwanted machines?

Agreed. If they both had heart attacks tomorrow I would be glad to not hear about them anymore.

The post is very clearly relevant, it’s addressing the innate problems of work. That’s antiwork.

Who is “they” and how might they “fix” the justice system ?

The oligarchs that own the country.

Are you proposing that allowing a jury of peers drawn from this public ought to be able to make up the law based on the vibe of cases before them ?

I’m proposing that the inherent protections the judicial system gives people be used to protect Luigi.

Justice is dead so long as billionaires can cause immeasurable death and suffering without repercussions.

You’re operating under the incorrect assumption that the public can control the law.

If that were the case you’d be right. But as of right now, this is the only check on their power. And it is an intentional check. The 2A was put in place to fight tyrants if it came to it, and it is quickly coming to it.

He’s pleading not guilty, claiming that the cops planted that shit.

And the cops routinely lie and plant evidence, so it’s not out of the question.

That’s been on my mind for a while now. They’re both assholes who can’t listen to “no” without throwing a fit. They’re eventually going to disagree on something, and it’s going to turn nasty.

So I’ll be ready with popcorn for when it eventually happens. Fascism always destroys itself, just not before killing everything it can.

Higher effort, higher reward

Don’t know what you’re talking about. They clearly have the wrong guy.