I know it’s a lot easier said than done but find your union and join it. Convince as many of your coworkers to join as you can. It’s the only way to fight the system sadly.

Come on man, you know they didn’t mean it literally 💀

there he is. Vinny.

lol tell me you’ve never used linux without telling me you’ve never used linux

I don’t think they would do that unless Lemmy continues to grow to a point where it challenges Reddit. Then it becomes a technical issue. I don’t think they can do that. It was one thing for threads to do it, being designed with that in mind from day 1, but it’s completely different for Reddit to do it. There are so many features that just wouldn’t make the jump, and so much content that would need to be reworked.

If they were going to do it, it would most likely be a clean break where you just can’t access old Reddit content on Lemmy, but all their new stuff would be accessible.

I also just don’t see them giving away their content like that after cracking down on the API how they did.

I feel like the amount of training data required for these AIs serves as a pretty compelling argument as to why AI is clearly nowhere near human intelligence. It shouldn’t take thousands of human lifetimes of data to train an AI if it’s truly near human-level intelligence. In fact, I think it’s an argument for them not being intelligent whatsoever. With that much training data, everything that could be asked of them should be in the training data. And yet they still fail at any task not in their data.

Put simply; a human needs less than 1 lifetime of training data to be more intelligent than AI. If it hasn’t already solved it, I don’t think throwing more training data/compute at the problem will solve this.

Shareholders: why not all three?

Oh nice. Thanks. I looked in the settings before but must’ve missed that one. Much better now opening articles without being assaulted with ads.

I have Firefox as my main browser on Android, but I still use the Google app for certain searches/news/weather, but it opens the articles in chrome. Anyone know a good alternative to the Google app that uses Firefox?

Yep

Yeah I should probably use gpt4. Just don’t want to pay for another subscription haha.

That’s fair I guess. I don’t have a VR headset or talk to AI so imo they’re both pretty nerdy. I only talk to chatGPT every now and then to see if it can help me with code problems, and it almost always fails spectacularly unless I’m doing something really basic.

I’m just saying the accessibility of AI doesn’t necessarily mean it has more utility. Just that it’s more accessible.

If you had to buy an expensive headset to use chatGPT she wouldn’t either.

Are we sure Tesla hasn’t done this too? Sounds like something they’d do.

Being fooled by Twitter users is worse as they can link to reputable sources (that usually wouldn’t post clickbait/bad headings). There’s also little incentive for twitter users to not post misleading headlines, while (some) journalists/news sites are trying to build a reputation of reputability. Yes, it would be solved by clicking the article, but you shouldn’t have to click every article to make sure the poster isn’t lying about the content.

That’s not the headline or the description written by the OP lol

That is not the obvious interpretation, and the headline (and description added by OP) are deliberately written to imply something that’s not true.

When uber first came out the prices were ridiculously low, think 1/3rd of taxi prices. Obviously wasn’t sustainable though I guess.

They all think they can win the streaming wars and become what Netflix was. They’re willing to sacrifice customer convenience in pursuit of that.