The contradiction is strong with this. Their conservatism is essentially stealing & purposely changing the entire motive of the event. This is essentially the same as with BLM and WLM - bunch of manipulative lunatics.

Also why sex (not gender) is biologically problematic.

I understand what you mean, but it seems like this post is filled with people that are willing to engage rather than be judgemental. Like the other person said, it is a sign of a good writer - to engage with the readers.

Of course, there are other cases within this site where people are jerks, but in this case you gotta understand that your own anger is spilling into situations where the only jerk is you.

I feel like this is one of those cases where “if you’ve got nothing nice to say, don’t say anything at all” should apply.

I agree. Everyone has their own preferences - some are minimalist preferring a “blank canvas” while some prefer a bit more than that. This kind of mentality goes beyond just tattoos, but it feels like a dice roll sometimes on social sites like this.

Majority of responses like this are straight up hypocrisy.

befall men if women were given the vote

Now the question is, how do I vote twice…

nothing is mentioned about the driver/gun owner

Its simply the case that this wasnt written for you (or us in this case). This is simply a right wing attempt at victim blaming while hiding the real subject here. Now root cause analysis I’ve seen isnt everybody’s suite, but right wingers really dismiss it the most.

Most people nowadays unfortunately. And it ain’t limited with discord - especially while we are in the AI era.

A situation that is avoidable turned into a hell scape for young people. And as fascism engulfs us, all the blame gets put on the youngest who speak out.

This neglect is what fundamentally will lead us into fascism. Laws are already there, the young in Australia & UK already feel the effects of suppression of speech. And the hatered towards this lack of trust is growing within all impacted age groups.

There are better ways to do what you are implying. The entire FOSS movement is an example of this.

Free doesn’t mean free beer.

Indoctrination is a real threat. Set them up for their agendas, and they’ll do the rest. Any notion of cancer will just be reflected back by such people, this is much more effective if education is scarce.

Ok. Tanning beds are cancer machines for everyone. The enablement is a consequence of allowing sun beds in the first place - this doesn’t change much honestly.

Also, what groups are cleared here? Teenagers? Children? There is a lot of ambiguity in that news site.

Soldered computer components shouldn’t even exist. There are way more downsides with it than up sides - of course it might be faster, but what’s the point if in a year or 2 the capacity will be insufficient. What do you do then? Toss it in the trash?

Honestly, we are going technologically behind. Rather than making proper standards for modularity, they rather make up dozen of excuses of how soldered is actually superior.

The way I understand about this stack is that it still relies on steam architecture under the hood. So emulation of the steam client to run the game is what has to occur?

Jellyfin is FOSS. Taking a single step towards the Plex route will be going against the ethos of Jellyfin as a whole. It is community owned - rather than private, and if there are unethical practice’s involved, then people can and will jump ship forking the whole project at nearly 1:1 scale.

Because of the way jellyfin is built and the underlying philosophy. It can’t enshitify that easily as Plex - it will need a massive community effort to change it.

It is also useful to read on the history of jellyfin as it does highlight some useful pointers.

Fascism starts with attacking the minorities. In this case minors are the tool, and reducing their rights to ashes will only enable further progression of fascism. It essentially feeds on discrimination.

Their brains are literally not fully developed

The brain doesn’t stop developing till your thirties, source. According to this argument 30 year olds should also be subjected to banning.

That is one hell of a strawman you got there.

The second paragraph is the one which should be constantly highlighted. Sometimes people rather argue for the sake of arguing rather than debate the root cause. This also relates to the point of how facts and logic supposedly give clarity to conversation - which sometimes they dont, as arguing is what they may desire.

How is this a distinction without a difference?

Firstly, example1 states that:

A minor is a person under the age of majority, typically 18 in many jurisdictions, focused on legal capacity, while a child generally refers to a person in the early stages of life, emphasizing dependency and development.

This goes with the evidence that zombie supplied - supporting the fact that child and minor refer to two different things. So I don’t necessarily understand where this distinction without a difference is here?

Secondly, there is no need for moving the goalposts as the definitions themselves are clear about differing aspects of those two words.