Many people immediately lose interest the second they see the word “crypto”.

Sure, I’ve never bought any crypto and don’t plan on doing it either.

But can some of you please get more specific about the reasons why, though? Is absolutely everything about it bad across the whole board, or are some currencies or subgroups worse than others? After all, there are many different implementations, and some are more energy demanding than others.

I ask because I’m genuinely curious and don’t know much about it.

Absolutely, people still need money. So P2P would not solve that bit, but at least the donations can go directly towards content creation rather than having to cover server costs as well.

Maybe a silly idea, but what about a P2P-based video hosting! Hear me out:

We have more computing power and bandwith in our homes than ever before. We know that sharing data and files via P2P works, is resiliant against attacks, and scales really well.

No server costs mean that people could support creators by seeding the content to other peers. One cool thing about that would be seeing how you are making a difference, in real time.

Now this is an interesting idea! We have more computing power and bandwith at our homes than ever before, and use only a fraction of it.

I would happily support Wikipedia, openmaps and other projects by seeding their data.

In could even be more fun and motivating to do, since you could see how you are making a difference in real time, as opposed to donations.

I want to communicate with others in a way that is privacy friendly, gives a good user experience and gives me control of my data. Tox seems good, but most of my friends and family have iphones, and none of the clients support that. Today they use Whatsapp, Messenger, etc. Signal would be a big improvement, but as far as I can tell it is still centralized and wants your phone number.

Maybe XMPP can work, I will check that out.

P2P caught my interest because of the possibilities that opens up when you remove the middle-man/server (even better call quality, no file size limits). But it doesn’t have to be P2P - I’m just a fan of “local first”, decentralization and democratization of technology in general.

I already listed my reasons for wanting to try out/use it, and they have nothing to do with crypto or micropayments.

If you can name alternatives with similar functionality made by people who are not affiliated with crypto, I’m all ears. Briar seems great for journalists and activists etc, but it is too limited to be used as a mainstream messenger for keeping in touch with friends and family. Seems like all you can do is send text and emojis, no video chat or photos.

Another interesting option https://holesail.io/

Yes, there are exceptions (that’s why I wrote “often”;)

Windows mobile had a great UX, I still miss it today! I thought they dropped support for it years ago?

I don’t find it surprising at all. The menus are often designed as kafka-esque with dark patterns all over, hiding toggles in submenu after submenu to make you go for the default setting (see privacy settings on facebook, notification settings on android). Then the app updates, the setting is somehow reverted, and you’re back to square one. No wonder people give up.

Seems like they’ve got that covered

I’m no crypto fan or plan on using micropayments either, but if I don’t use it, where’s the harm?

So far battery and data usage is ok, but we’ll see after some more testing

I’m testing syncing, notification and battery usage now on a few devices to see how it behaves. So far, so good. It also lets you specify which type of user you are inviting, so that admins does the heavy lifting

My bad, on the Pears homepage it says “Join the open-source P2P revolution”, so I assumed that was the case.

Someone asked the same question in the community group chat. Seems like the UI for Keet is closed atm, the rest is open.

When an LLM fabricates a falsehood, that is not a malfunction at all. The machine is doing exactly what it has been designed to do: guess, and sound confident while doing it.

When LLMs get things wrong they aren’t hallucinating. They are bullshitting.

source: https://thebullshitmachines.com/lesson-2-the-nature-of-bullshit/index.html

I’m lost for words.

…what if the whole family is watching? Does everyone have to raise their hands and yell “McDonalds”? Including the kids?

This might just as well be used in “smart” fridges. “Do this corporate dance to get 20% off your next Corn Flakes”

Is this real?? Do you have the source?

Cool! Out of curiosity, what was the trigger and/or motivation to make the switch?

Thank you for expanding on this topic, and I get what you’re saying about proper UX and how it requires a holistic understanding.

It least that is what is required to climb from “ok, I guess” to “good”. But is there something that could get us from “terrible” to “ok, I guess”? What’s your take on better, clearer design guidelines for example?

Well, people make good code that is open source, even though it doesn’t make them any money. Same with wikipedia articles.

So why are we not seeing more contributions in the form of better UX/UI it the open source world? I don’t see a logical reason why that has to be the case. The question is what can we do to change it, and also get UX-designers on board?