Yeah, comic only laugh. Funny funny or else why? Why comic if no funny? Funny pages, comics, funny /s

Dude, comics can be whatever the fuck you want. Want to make a comic that’s just four panels of an unmoving rock? Still a comic. And there’s no reason why anyone should question otherwise.

Between this and all the “how is this a meme?” comments. Most inane, useless comments. Maybe, just maybe, it wasn’t meant for you? Clearly it’s getting upvotes

Imagine being perfectly fluent in German, but only when gorked out your damn orb.

Please. Please tell me no one is actually considering online voting. There’s no way to maintain anonymity and vote integrity.

That’s how you get your paper published. Find the stat with the happiest (see, statistically relevant) outcome, publish based solely on that.

Jet set. Jet set. Jet set, ahhhhh, Groovy! JET SET RADIO!

Is this sarcasm?

Sorry for the confusion. Yellow is a single wavelength of light. We perceive it with the green and red receptors in our eyes, but it is a single wavelength. Purple isn’t a single wavelength, but two that are being interpreted as a color.

That was the distinction I was calling out.

“Regulatory capture, got it” -Auto industry

Definition I’m using is any color that can be expressed as a single wavelength of light. Purple cannot be, since it’s actually two wavelengths simultaneously.

Violet and purple are distinct terms here.

Purple, the color directly between red and blue, is a creation of your mind interpreting a band of light that triggers your red and blue sensing nerves, but no green is sensed. The actual band of light we can see goes from red to green to blue. Purple doesn’t fall between those colors, meaning it wouldn’t be included in a rainbow, and isn’t any “pure” light you could see, since it doesn’t fall on the spectrum.

Essentially, any time you see purple, you’re seeing two different frequencies of light that your mind interprets as a single frequency.

Is it a skittles reference or is it a reference to purple not being an actual color and thus not a part of the rainbow?

No, all 7 holes (nostrils, mouth, tear ducts) have a common cavity, so they’re 7 holes not one.

https://youtu.be/egEraZP9yXQ

7, if the cut-off is 60 microns (tear ducts). Smaller than that, we’re essentially Swiss cheese.

“We hate that poors get to vote in our country. Don’t they know that this was a country founded with the ideals that only landowning white men could vote? Apparently they changed that law at some point, so we just make new ones to make the poors not want to vote. Like depriving them of things they need to live if they choose to do so. It’s what they get for being poors. Johohoho!”

• American lawmakers in poor, conservative states

In all honesty, it’s fucked. It’s so fucked.

Complete tangent, but I don’t think superscript numbers are a good choice in chemical notation. You’re trying to use them here to stand-in for subscript numbers, but superscript numbers have a meaning in chemistry as well. They denote ions.

So, I think CO2 is more accurate than CO², since it could be confused as carbon monoxide with some sort of ion of charge 2 (unclear of positive or negative).

There should just be a law that just periodically breaks up AT&T all companies every few years.

Given capitalisms inevitable march towards monopoly, this would just be good business.

We purposefully neglected viable alternatives because of the power of the auto industry here. Florida especially, since it has extremely limited space for development, should’ve spent its energy on rail rather than car infrastructure.

As my brother can attest to, there are women take anyone who passes as a man as a threat in the women’s restroom and will go get people to do something. Poor dude was just trying to get tampons.