Yeah, I don’t know either. I found it an interesting read, it also goes into conversation design in games. Felt like it would be appropriate here?
Yeah, I don’t know either. I found it an interesting read, it also goes into conversation design in games. Felt like it would be appropriate here?
deleted by creator
Er ikke politisk ekspert men har lurt på dette selv før. Men partier som FRP, nei til bompenger, etc er gjerne hva vi kan kalle «misnøyepartier». Partier som appeller til folk som er misfornøyde på et eller annet vis. Dette behøver ikke å være en konkret politisk ting. F.eks at du føler at ting forandrer seg for fort i samfunnet, eller at du føler at for mye fremmede ting tar plass, eller at dine ytringer blir stigmatisert (mens det føltes ok å si ting i bygda 20 år siden).
FRP har gjerne retorikk og symbolsaker som appellerer til følelsen at ting har tatt en tullete vei. Husker du kanskje at de bokstavelig talt hadde en liste mot «dusteforbud»? Mange av tingene i den listen har en ekte grunn til å bli forbudt, men om man nå mener at «jeg brukte solarium som tenåring og jeg fikk aldri kreft» så tenker man ikke i det store bildet. Men med slike partier handler det ofte om egen misnøye. (Dette er ikke eksklusivt til FRP altså, hvem stemmer høyre for å bedre andre folks skatt?)
Dette kommer til neste punkt, FRP er eksperter på grasrotbevegelser. Ingen sak er for liten. Mens Høyre ikke kunne se lavere enn fylkesnivå og AP bare fokuserte på å vedlikeholde industrien, så tok lokallaget FRP opp alle småtingene som vanlige folk sytret om.
For å sette det i perspektiv. I det store bildet er mye viktig, men i hverdagen erger folk seg mer om å måtte betale for en plastpose.
My current provider took care of most of that but i agree it is too difficult for most.
“Wins”, really? That’s a disgusting way of putting it. He’s compensated for time spent in prison, but the time will be forever lost.
Aye, I missed that bit. Still annoying that something that was ad free has ads. But that’s more sensible.
I agree they make it seem exceptionally dramatic, but I do understand the annoyance of having a service included (an email address) and soon I need to pay for it. That is extremely annoying.
You can always buy a domain, and let a service take care of email hosting for you. Lots of email providers allow this.
Precisely, me and my wife have switched email providers several times while keeping the same address.
As for the reason I brought up Facebook moderation is, what do you think is usually posted there? Minion memes? Photos from trips? Well those moderators are often subjected to beheadings, rape, and other very graphic content. Do you think that was explicitly stated when they got hired?
No likely not, and Facebook clearly deserves a proper reckoning. But I don’t see how this relates or makes it ok.
And I am not making any arguments whatsoever on whether or not she should actually have to see “comments from people talking about how they wanted to fuck me and my co workers.”.
Would you say LTT/LMG sells itself as a channel about sex or porn or the likes? No, it’s a tech channel and as such one would expect tech related social media. You could state that the function of the job is unchanged, but the job content is also relevant here.
The kind interactions (including pictures and such) you get on OF vastly differs what you will get on other platforms. That’s not in the job description.
And to your last point, she was a social media manager, not a Facebook moderator. How does that compare? Are you intentionally making bad faith arguments?
Because the internet is exceptionally shit against women in particular, and because she clearly stated she didn’t want to do it.
This is kinda basic stuff.
I have moved to a new country myself (from within Europe to within Europe). I feel such articles often underestimate how important culture and language is for us to work together. Beyond just skills and education. Ironically though, employment is a quick way to learn how to fit in.
In the Netherlands, I want to say that Apple Maps is actually better than Google… but only if you’re driving.
For some insane reason they don’t have biking maps here (or at least in all the places I’ve tried) which is such an enormous blunder.
It really is. Luckily it’s a skill that can be trained.
I’ve only skimmed your comments, but I think a factor is also that a lot of them are really hard to read.
Examples I see are weird sentence structure, the lack of paragraphs for longer messages, the lack of capitalisation, and rather odd/hyperbolic use of words (writing in the same way you’d speak?). This “style” just gets interpreted as “noise” when I’m reading it, which will get downvoted as it doesn’t contribute.
English isn’t my first language either (it’s not even my second or third!) so I understand it’s very hard to get these things right. But without sufficient clarity you will get downvotes, as it just comes off as noise.
Yeah same. I see a mix of positive and negative.
Oppvarming av elv og sjø er en faktor, men du kan ikke bygge kjernekraft hvor det ikke er en (betydelig) kilde vann. Det kan du med vind. Så jeg sier ja takk, begge deler.
At noe ikke-fornybar energi må brukes for fornybare ressurser er ikke nødvendigvis et argument imot fornybare kilder. Vi bygger heller ikke vasskraft eller geotermalske kraftverk ut av resirkulert papp og gamle klær. Det er et stort og vanskelig regnestykke, for hva som er bærekraftig energi.
At vind ikke er regulerbart er forsåvidt sant, men vi har en rimelig forventning av vind. Det er ikke slik at plutselig har et år med 80% mindre vind. Og selv om vinden kan komme til unyttige tider, kan msn bruke pumper som fyller reservoarer med vann, som et slags «batteri» av potensiell energi for når det er mest nyttig.
Jeg selv er også stor tilhenger av atomkraft men jeg tror vi bygger vindmøller i midten av Oslo sentrum før vi bygger atomkraft i Norge.
Videre, hvorfor ikke begge? Kjernekraft kan ikke bygges hvor som helst grunnet kjøling. Der er vind mye mer fleksibelt.
You just exit them? It’s the people getting onto a roundabout that have to wait.