• 1 Post
  • 29 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 14th, 2023

help-circle






  • Do you have any idea who this person is? He’s about as close to something resembling a real communist as my dog is to a hippo. This guy lives in Toronto and spends most of his time spewing propaganda specifically to drive wedges between western Democracies. He an authoritarian imperialist who would never be allowed the opinions he holds if he lived anywhere but a western democracy.

    He posts so much it’s shocking he even gets a git commit in. He’s a high end software engineer living in one of the most privileged countries on the planet, in one of the most expensive cities in the world, in one of the highest paid professions within that city. Statistically speaking, he is the 1% of 1%, and yet he spends most of his time lamenting his privilege and promiting the activity of authoritarian regimes. And it’s effective. He regularly gets content to the front of Lemmy. But read the first comment of those posts. It’s always garbage. This strategy is the same strategy the neonazis and fascists used to get Donald Trump into power in 2016.

    And that’s where the rub is. Tankies are indistinguishable from neofacsists ideologically, and to debate them in good faith is to elevate their, truly bad faith behavior, to a level it does not deserve. I take the future of our world far too seriously to offer a good faith position to people who never have had it in the first place.

    Tankies are mostly juvenile young men engaged in the same kind of quasiintellectual solipsism that result in a broad and now material neofacsist movement in the US. They are taking advantage of the same gullible psychodemographics that the modern neofacsist movement did. One should not take them in good faith, the future is too important.








  • I think it becomes a question of what well back up and ‘insure’ as a society. Because we’re willing to back people up and insure against the risk of driving in a vehicle, we require certain safety standards, levels of training, etc.

    I think people should and need to be able to make all the stupidest decisions they can possibly make. I also don’t think it’s society’s role to absorb that risk. I don’t think a major search and rescue operation should have been undertaken for people doing something that was incredibly risky and dangerous. It’s an edge that should stay sharp, and have real consequences. But I also strongly believe we shouldn’t be regulating people’s behavior to not also take that risk. That’s their business and the whole point of living in a liberal society. As a society we get to decide which corners to pad and which edges to soften. I’d like to see us padding the corners and reduce the risk for an immigrants voyage on an over packed boat to try and better themselt rather than some dipshit billionaires obviously stupid hobby.

    I think both of them having the right to take that risk is a fundamental human right. But we as a society get to decide which risks well offer some cushion to.