I’m supposed to provide proof for my response to your claim, yet you aren’t required to source your original claim of “Because they don’t want anyone to leave”? No no :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim, especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.[1] This is also stated in Hitchens’s razor, which declares that “what may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.” Carl Sagan proposed a related criterion – “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” – which is known as the Sagan standard.[2]

…

One way in which one would attempt to shift the burden of proof is by committing a logical fallacy known as the argument from ignorance. It occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proven true.[8][9]

I’m not going to be engaging with you now, or in the future. This is extraordinarily bad form, and a huge waste of time.

Wow, that was the entire conversation? Where was I getting this idea that you were claiming Israel would not let refugees leave to Egypt?

Oh, that was exactly what you said… “Because they don’t want anyone to leave.”

And yes, I am. Because I read what you said.

That isn’t all you said, your comments are all here on display for everyone to read. And I’m very clear on what you are saying.

I specifically asked you to quote me saying that there are no IDF troops at the border, and you failed to, and I reject you mischaracterizing my argument. You very specifically said “Because they don’t want anyone to leave.” and have yet to provide evidence. Reframing your unsourced claim as “they can’t cross a border due to an invading force controlling it” is disingenuous and in bad faith, and also not substantiated as it similarly implies without evidence Israel’s intentions.

Thank you for posting another comment devoid of a source for your claims. The “source” you posted previously does not support your assertion of Israel’s intentions. Injection of this is a strawman, followed by your unsubstantiated opinion of what it means to you personally. You have yet to prove Israel would not let refugees leave to Egypt.

I am in no way trolling.

You know what, I’ll keep going :)

Quote where I said there aren’t IDF troops. Because it would be a shame if you were lying about what I said. This is where evidence (not opinion) comes in.

A “fact” you just can’t seem to source.

You stating it doesn’t make it true, that’s where evidence comes in. I can state that Egypt’s actions demonstrate the same, they could just walk away. And with just as much evidence as you provided.

I understand this is your personal opinion, and that there is no evidence supporting your claims of Israel’s intentions to not let refugees leave, even to Egypt. I won’t be continuing this discussion with you.

Because then it’s unsourced opinion/speculation. Bickering between Egypt and Israel aside, if Egypt unilaterally opened their side of the Rafah crossing, Israel has said they would not let refugees leave?

Has Israel stated they would not let refugees leave? Say Egypt unilaterally opens the Rafah crossing, Israel would stop them from leaving?

Dude, read who wrote that comment

That’s another user…

Edit: and who said I was specifying the Iranian military?

Rewrote the above comment, my mistake for misinterpreting. I’m still waiting for you to quote me saying you’re defending Hamas.

Deleted, I misread the comment. Source saying that Israel controls whether they stay or leave?

Please quote where I said you defended Hamas. (Hint: I didn’t)

Hmm, I feel that divorcing Iran’s proxies from Iran is more disingenuous (and I’m not lying about their relation). It’s also not refuting the content of the posts, which again, clearly illustrate my point. Sorry, and thanks for the discussion!

The first is a middle east monitor article. And Hamas/Hezbollah=Iran. Also, entirely missing the point, my points are very clearly illustrated here.

A point no one contested, they’re simply forcing them to stay there.

Only if you don’t consider Hamas as a proxy of Iran. I’m objectively being honest.

Agree, Palestinians deserve better than Hamas.

Thank you for verifying again that I never said these things, and that your accusations are unfounded.