Blessed be the fruit.

I remember reading a few days ago that OpenAI basically ordered 3 times as much RAM as they could use this year. There are also data centers fully equipped but not turned on as the local power grid could not handle the added demand.

Yet again, the age old law “if a headline ends with a question mark, the answer is no” proves itself true.

Well at this point you can escalate, since they escalated first after being kicked out. But you don’t start by arresting.

stop delivery if human rights are violated

“if”. What a fucking joke.

I hate the political compass. r/PCM did a lot in normalizing the far right and recruiting for them. And it’s not even close to accurate (Hitler shows up as barely to the right ffs).

Why would we need an alternative to Wikipedia?

I mean there was already the Conservapedia, that’s nothing new.

I mean, yeah, government drones are not animals, I don’t see the problem here.

To follow up on this, I never heard about someone switching to leftist ideals after brain damage, always to the right.

Sigh

“using reason and math” and yet you disagree with the scientific consensus that climate change is man made (“only half” is disagreeing) because of a feeling.

Also what’s the threshold to “be a problem”? 1.5%? Why?

That would leave only 8 (maybe 10, depending on the source) countries that “matter”, with a total of 67-69% of the world’s emissions. So more than 30% of the world’s emissions are not a problem?

Seriously…

Wow, just wow…

For starters, your belief does not matter. There are lots and lots of scientists that actually work on this, with real world data, and the consensus is that climate change is mostly of human origin (I didn’t say most emissions, but climate change itself; it’s not just about total emissions but about the planet’s capacity to absorb those), and even you could easily see that natural emissions were taken care of by that very same nature, until the industrial revolution, where what we add to the whole cycle started overwhelming nature’s ability to recycle emissions. Your feelings are of no significance.

As for the rest, as other have said, just because you feel (again) that we don’t matter doesn’t mean we don’t. 1.5% is a lot, whether you feel it is or not, especially considering we’re only 0.5% of the population. If you still don’t understand my point, it means we’re a huge source or emissions per capita. We’re actually polluting more than the US per capita.

If the world wants to reduce their emissions, the whole world has to work on it, not just the few biggest culprits. Also that whole diatribe is missing a pretty crucial point: China, the biggest emitter, is also one of the countries moving toward renewables the fastest.

So what? Do we have to wait until we’re left as one of the biggest emitters until we actually do something about it?

There’s also the fact that our oil comes from oil sands, which is harder to extract and produces even more pollution to extract and refine. All oil is not equal. Also moving away from oil and into renewables means we use less of the first, so no need to import as much. And people here are not even arguing for stopping completely our production, just not to build yet another pipeline (which is not just about expanding production, pipelines are not reliable, very often have leaks that pollute even more, and destroy the environment).

Stop using your feelings and hypotheticals, and use actual data.

Don’t spend too much effort there. They explained in this very thread that they don’t believe anthropogenic climate change is what the actual scientists working on this are telling us it is, with another shitty comparison (because a volcano feels like it’s doing much more than humans).

You cannot reason people out of something they were not reasoned into.

Hard disagree. From my experience you can perfectly collaborate from a distance, it’s mostly a matter of organizing around it. Of course it can vary on the type of work, so I would think that the better answer is “it depends”.

Yet in your comment you declare that it sucks and mostly does not work as a general rule? I just want to say that your own experience, while relevant, does not necessarily apply to everyone. Maybe it sucks for you, maybe it sucks for most people you work with or talked with about that subject. But one experience, or even a group of experiences, do not make for a universal truth.

I know I’m not in the majority because of my back problems, but reclining seats actually help for me. There was one time where I was moved to a seat just in front of the escape paths and couldn’t recline it, it was torture for me and I had back pains for a few days after the 8h flight.

All that to say, remind yourself that the way these affect you or not is not universal.

Yeah I guessed as much, hence the blocking, I don’t need that when reading comments. Thanks for confirming!

You clearly either don’t know what a genocide is, or you shill way too much for Bibi. Either way, blocked, and I encourage everyone to do as much, you don’t have anything to actually add to the conversation.

Once again someone conflating fighting Hamas with genociding Palestinians. Nice whataboutism.

The camera wouldn’t emerge through the other side until the whole pole is through though, the Stargates only pass matter to the other end once the full object has entered.

They didn’t put any word in your mouth. You, however, did.