It’s Trumptastic!

A CEO who is clueless about their organization’s nature is at an enormous disadvantage. I think it is too common now. Part of the reason so much sucks ass

I think that it is a combination of better diagnostic practices, diagnostic ambiguities, and ever popular exploitation. I know individuals with ADHD who fit the bill to me, and I know individuals who acknowledge they don’t have it and yet have a prescription. So, there is some unfortunate noise in the statistics, because of abusers.

“ 12.0% Estimated percentage of the U.S. population with diabetes”

• https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/php/data-research/index.html

So, should diabetes not be treated?

Avoiding Chinese companies is a factor for me, BUT if the choice is between a Chinese company that wouldn’t comply with a five-eyes data request vs one that would, then I would definitely prefer my data be stolen by a foreign country that doesn’t see me as a sovereign risk

It’s a tossup whether Germany runs with evil again for WW3. I have no clue where they will stand, and that’s pretty damning of them.

Hmm, maybe, I don’t really know. I think my uncertainty is in understanding if we have various genetically driven behaviors like so many other animals. Many of us (animals) kill and do many harmful (malicious) things to each other for survival and reproduction. We may not see it as malicious when other animals do it, because it’s “natural.” We seem to pretend that we aren’t part of nature. Some traits like ASPD do seem to greatly aid in the survival game.

Do you believe that there are many behaviors of animals that genetically predetermined?

1. Privatize education
2. Use AI to form personalized propaganda for each child
3. Lock in generations of ignorance and harmful behaviors while profiting

rooted in a fundamental belief that everyone wants to be good at heart

What about if antisocial personality disorder is mostly genetic? Couldn’t some of the behaviors be defined as intentional? It’s still not that person’s fault of course. How does that fit into your theory?

Interviewer: Margaret Atwood, what are your thoughts on the trend in the US?

Atwood: I’m Canadian

Oh, they do trickle down on ya! Not with what want ya though

I bet those sales douches are happy with the bonuses they will get.

I don’t like sales dudes.

How is your behavior any different than the multitude in power and authority who turned a blind eye? Have you considered the life of those he abused? Have you considered the moral battle that is happening?

The moment you begin to mean more to me than he does, then we’ll talk.

Decency and a will against abject evil should be all that it takes to do the right thing. You don’t want to leak here? Fine. ProPublica.

Naming him would do no good.

That is not true. There is no accountability if people keep protecting them. Leak his name. It will help current investigators. It will help future prosecutors. If you don’t do it here or elsewhere, then YOU are not better than him.

It would work out to be a bit of mutually assured murder of their families.

Thugs A and B are never allowed to know each other.

If thug A decides to kill oligarch A, and then travel a long distance to aid thug B in killing oligarch B, then they could likely fail, because oligarchs A & B worked out a means to communicate their proof of life to each other. Many ways to do that, including dedicated messengers. If oligarch B hasn’t received a timely proof of life, then they murder thug A’s family and tell thug B that their family is in danger from outsiders overtaking bunker A. Thug B will likely travel to bunker A.

The thugs would have to collude. A major goal of the oligarchs will be placing many obstacles against collusion.

their families all held hostage in the bunker as well

Now, someone is starting to think like evil.

Better yet would be some cooperation between remote bunkers, where family for workers of bunker A are held far away in bunker B, and vice versa.

What??? That makes no sense.

You’ve not been ridden before?

He would just need placed prone, and the poor victim forced atop.

It’s weird how you won’t concede something so obviously true.

Name him

Are you for age (ID) verification? Are you fine with no channels of privacy? Do you support things like chat control in the EU?

If you do, then you are blind to how these people think and operate.