Amazing answer, thanks a lot!

Dunno what i’m getting downvotes for

So… are you saying the air inside a city park isn’t better at all?

Yeah but then it would be a massive and cheap stretch to say they “use lightning” to kill neighbours

How the fluff do they kill an average of 9 neighboring trees? By throwing wines at them? Or do they forward the elecrocute?

(I know it doesn’t have detailed info in the article but maybe some of you nerds can provide some sweet knowledge)

You misgendered round spicy flames

Does anyone know how the crowd reacted? I mean except the mentioned boing (also like 10 out of several k were boing or more like 50%?)?

He did learn alot from his first term: How to be powerful as a president for example

Regarding the new chancellors name: “t” stands for “totally not a blackrock millionair screwing everyone for the benefit of his class”. So his name is, in fact, Merz.

Sometimes its a fine line between infographs and memes. Sometimes it isn’t

Thanks! I think it would be a great rule of thumb for lemmy to always include sauce and especially the sidefacts about the data that relativize it. (See other replies)

Less shiny maybe, but more real :)

“White american male twitter users”, according to the last paragraph

Interesting. Can we have have at least a tiny bit of info how this data came to be?

Not just this one, but all the infographs, maps etc. Always leave entirely open if someone just guessed the data for the lulz.

This makes me a litte sad sometimes

How about I synthesize them aminos in my biceps, amigos

I’ll see myself out

It is also a somehow hot take because it kinda puts the burden of systemic misconfiguration on individuals shoulders (oh hey we’ve seen this before, after and all the time, hashtag (neo)liberalism).

I agree people who did that fucked up. But having your existence as an academic, your job, maybe the only thing you’re good at rely on publishing a ton of papers no matter what should be taken into account.

This is a huge problem for science not just since LLM’s.

I see. Thanks

Isnt thatvway to much volume for text? I would imagine every book ever written to be judt a few tb. But I also don’t know much about the issue

Awesome comment. Thank you! This is where something starts to become visible: the weird indirect physical and psychological violence of liberal ideology.

It’s base claim is: If everyone, as a single enlighted decent individual agent, would just play by the rules (fair markets), everything would be at it’s best. All of them shall thrive.

Now all those good christians go through life working their ass of, actually trying to be “a good person”, but after decades they have to painfully find out: It doesn’t work out. Most of them get more stressed, poorer, there’s ecological destruction, war and so on. Almost no one get’s to thrive.

As you pointed out, finding out about capitalism and (neccessarilly collectively) paving a way to more rational production and fairer distribution, is difficult. You could almost say it’s practically and ideologically out of reach. You know, because your freedoms depend on liberal individualism.

They end up with two options: 1. Look for an outside menace to the otherwise funtional market game (immigrants, jews, or heck why not trans people) 2. Get more of the same: more privatizarion, less social welfare etc.

They cling ever harder to a political decision, the more it harms them. This is brutal and sad af imo.

Real agency is possible, just not the individualist kind liberalism is successfully promising them in their despair of heteronomy.

Thanks y’all

Sounds amazing. What is the aproximate cost for all the parts needed?

You’re a writer too. If you so far decided to not get organized, you and your fellow writers are just copying what you read from others.