The article has a typo; you won’t find CVE-2026-53111 for Linux, but you will find CVE-2026-23111, which is already fixed if you do not postpone updates more than a month.

20+ years ago I needed to know how to burn a CD before making the switch. I think WinXP was the last, I have use on a private PC.

All my windows use today is work related; no games there.

Yes, this exactly. Thx.

proton GE

hmm, I just install it through flatpak; I am a simple person.

ok, you win. [=

Yes, but in a way the graphs themselves look not es gnomie I would like them to have. They could look closer to the graph that is being done for the Wellbeing feature in the gnome-control-center.

This is dangerous PR. I hope they eventually adapt the new report guidelines for Linux security bugs!

I used the debootstrap method for installing Debian on btrfs. This involves manually installing the boot loader I did choose systemd-boot. I must say, I think it is a kind of advanced method, because I don’t know if I would have a running Debian on btrfs with encryption and working hibernate without my Gentoo-past.

Here I found a guide which is close to what I have done: https://sysguides.com/install-debian-13-with-btrfs with some optional stuff you may not need/want. I think, key is avoiding the debian installer

Try out the PaperWM extension. It transforms Gnome into a linear window manager like niri.

I am a flatpak/GNU/Linux user ^^

I have seen phased rollouts already in Ubuntu. Will it be possible to temporary override a phased update to get it anyway?

Besides that, great addition, I just want the ability to do it. You never know, when you need it.

I could update Ubuntu servers despite the DDoS.

I am running Steam through flatpak on Debian.

Or provide them in the first place.

I have use cases for btrfs, xfs and zfs. Somehow ext4 feels legacy or for small systems like Raspberries or when the cloud-image provided is already ext4.

I use BTRFS for personal PCs because of the subvolume feature (since one year or so), ZFS for backup/archive when I need raid and encryption capability without hardware raid and for proxmox. XFS is for large storage servers where hardware raid is already established or very special cases when a lot of inodes are needed.

I have a similar need and I am curious whether my current solution is any good:

The data of interest is on a server which can only be accessed with ssh inside the institution. I’ve setup a read-only nfs share to a server which has a webserver (https enabled). There, I set up a temporary webdav share to the read-only nfs mount point and protected with htpasswd, hence external institution members do not have accounts at our institution.

As soon as the transfer is complete I remove all the shares (nfs, webdav).

And no mention of gpg or s/mime support either.

Oh, I thought hibernation is always understood as suspend to disk and sleep as suspend to ram.

One should consider power consumption regardless of the price. If it is no server, you can prolong the life of your hardware not running it 24/7.