raspberry_confetti@sh.itjust.workstoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.ml•watching your children dieEnglish
12·
1 year agokys, and then ko’s
kys, and then ko’s
Bingo, exactly this. I said 80 because that’s typically what I see our projects get to after writing actually useful tests. But if your coverage is 80% and it’s all just tests verifying that a constant is still set to whatever value, then yeah, thats a useless metric.
Is it just me, or are google’s results turning into pure shit lately?
80%. Much beyond that and you get into a decreasing return on the investment of making the tests.
swoon
Bow chicka bow wow
It’s an older crossover, but it checks out
And shitting (are we still shitting?)
good human
Illinois fucking rocks, though