[deleted]

It helps mislead the public into thinking AI is something different than it actually is.

This plus the way he acts and behaves has very cold blooded reptilian vibes.

I know a lot of neurodiverse people and nobody I have met in person reminds me of Zuch.

Penguin = 0 m

AIO

Gordon Gekko from Wallstreet

The bubble already sucks and it popping will suck differently.

Have any of their super models lived up to the hype?

Of course this one won’t either.

Life gave humans citrons and bitter oranges and we used them to make lemons.

They could use reliable sources to approach 100% instead of jamming literally everything in. For example, limiting the training data to peer reviewed papers would not be exactly 100% but it would be a lot closer than including all of reddit.

I missed that one, but saw the foot rest.

You are massively overthinking it.

Just do what you enjoy and it is a hobby. You can always have more than one hobby if you have the time and can afford it. You can even switch between hobbies that you focus on at any point in time!

Half of both.

On the other side is an assumption that a publisher can just set significantly sifferent prices in different store fronts and are entitled to being on those store fronts. That isn’t the case either, brick and mortar stores have always had the option to not carry an item when the sale price is significantly different than other store fronts.

The 30% thing is also incredibly misrepresented. Regular and online stores always have a significant markup for the vast majority of their stock, with a few high profile items as exceptions to that rule.

This is my favorite comment of the week ao far, kudos.

You can tell these are upside down 9s because of how they are.

Steam is choosing not to distribute the game at a significantly higher price than elsewhere if the publisher is choosing that pricing structure. The publisher can either choose to distribute on steam with a comparable (not identical) price on steam or not distribute on steam.

Steam isn’t making the publisher do anything on other storefronts and as you pointed out what Ubi was doing was anticompetitive.

Lowering the price on steam would have been a remedy and would have benefitted players, just like all of the sales on steam that it actively promotes where the publisher drops the price.

This is about Ubi trying to be anticompetitive in pricing on their store and steam choosing to not go along with it. Steam consistently lowers the prices of games overall and always has.

Steam was saying that if they want to sell it cheaper elsewhere then they should also sell it cheaper on steam. Steam threatened to delist the game if the prices weren’t consistent because it was comparatively overpriced by a significant amount.

They did not say the publisher needed to raise the price elsewhere, just that it needed to be consistent.

If they used care and dedication they could make the fancy autocomplete return factual information now.

Blogs being slower is a benefit!

The go go go have to meet unrealistic deadlines for the algorithm pressure from large sites is a negative.