• 4 Posts
  • 157 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 14th, 2025

help-circle



  • I think it’s a network problem. Most people use Chrome, therefore most people’s friends and co-workers use Chrome, so there’s a strong incentive to go with the pack. Google is obviously exploiting this to get their ecosystem claws in deeper, but I think the main thing is that Google effectively dethroned Microsoft as the default, and Mozilla has just kind of “been around” the whole time as the weird alt browser that the IT guy uses, even being propped up by Google in exchange for Firefox users’ search data.

    What should Mozilla do? IDK. I don’t think “more AI” is the right answer, but I also don’t know what I would do in their position. It’s a tight spot.






  • I don’t know if this is a good idea necessarily, but what I do to get grime out from under my nails is to (very carefully) scrape under the nail and across the quick with the tip of my pocketknife. it’s got a very sharp, narrow blade with a fine point. Between that and a heavy-duty degreaser soap, something you might find at a mechanic shop, I can usually get my nails clean enough to eat with in fairly short order.

    I have cut myself under a nail using this method and that is very unpleasant so it’s probably not ideal, but it works well enough with a steady hand that I keep doing it. Been many years now since I’ve drawn blood.

    If time isn’t a factor, I’ll just wash normally and let whatever doesn’t come off just sit under the nails for a while. eventually it’ll grow out and wash out on its own and I don’t have to go poking around. I only use the knife if I don’t feel comfortable letting whatever’s under my nails stay there. Garden dirt? Let it ride. Automotive fluid medley? Probably not great to absorb through the skin, gonna try to get that off quickly.


  • My town does have a website but it doesn’t do much other than list phone numbers and office hours for a few departments. what services are available on it are contracted out to corporate partners. I would not be surprised if the website itself is managed by a corporation as well. It is mostly useless and there is very little motivation to improve it.

    But I’m not really talking about a municipal datacenter, more like a community center or library branch having a digital commons for the neighborhood, with some useful tools, access to reliable data, and maybe some recreational software. Something like what Nextdoor should have been but not enshittified to death by VC.




  • I would love a (solar-powered) community datacenter that hosts services for the local population. Community bulletin board or forum to share event notices, lost pets, road closures etc, simple messaging and filesharing utilities for those not technical enough to host their own, maybe some simple games like chess or cards.

    The problem with the current explosion of datacenters is that they don’t benefit the community at all, they’re just digital oil rigs that drain the community of resources while also actively poisoning the area they’re in. Small wonder communities are against them.







  • Reading through the opinion, I wouldn’t be surprised to see this ruling come up in defense of chatbots trained on copyrighted works.

    A provider induces infringement if it actively encourages
    infringement through specific acts. Grokster, 545 U. S., at
    942 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). For example, in Grokster,
    we held that a jury could find two file-sharing software com-
    panies liable for inducement. Id., at 941 (majority opinion).
    The companies promoted and marketed their software as a
    tool to infringe copyrights. Id., at 926. The “principal ob-
    ject” of their business models “was use of their software to
    download copyrighted works.”
    

    “Sure, it can rip off copyrighted works, but your honor, we pinky promise that was never our principal object”. I could see it flying. Interestingly enough, the US Solicitor General explicitly brought up DMCA safe harbor in its amicus brief (siding with Cox):

    The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA),
    Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860 (17 U.S.C. 512), gave
    service providers, including ISPs, a safe-harbor defense
    to claims of copyright infringement. That defense
    shields ISPs from liability for copyright infringement
    based on, among other things, “the provider’s transmit-
    ting, routing, or providing connections for, material
    through a system or network controlled or operated by
    or for the service provider.” 17 U.S.C. 512(a). To qual-
    ify for that safe harbor, the service provider must
    “adopt[] and reasonably implement[] * * * a policy that
    provides for the termination in appropriate circum-
    stances of subscribers * * * who are repeat infringers.”
    

    I’d expect this admin to brief the court in a way that favors Musk et al, and it kind of makes sense that you’d want to bolster safe harbor protections, but I imagine a safe harbor defense of LLMs would require the reasonable policy of not training your LLM on a bunch of copyrighted works without their permission, with the express intent of creating derivative works on demand for your paying clients.

    Opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-171_bq7d.pdf

    US SG amicus brief: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-171/359730/20250527172556075_Cox-Sony.CVSG.pdf