I’ve seen many threads suggesting products but they often don’t mention FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software. With FOSS you are already boycotting capitalism, on either side. Free and Open Source ignores borders and shouldn’t be categorized in nationalist terms, no matter where some of the maintainers happen to live.

  • skarn@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    investment in stabilizing Linux enough to make it a feasible alternative

    Do you care to elaborate? If I had to write a list of reasons why Linux might not be ready for your average cubicle… Stability wouldn’t be one of them.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Not the other commenter, but they likely meant stability with respect to device drivers. The kernel is great at not degrading with a high uptime, but there’s consumer stuff that’s just perpetually unimplemented, buggy, or minimally-functional:

      • Sensor monitoring on Ryzen platforms
      • Realtek NIC chipsets
      • Nvidia cards and proprietary drivers for anything and everything other than compute workloads
      • Nvidia cards older than the RTX 2000 series and FOSS drivers
      • Peripherals targeted towards “gamers”

      None of this is the kernel maintainers fault, of course. The underlying issue is the usual one of shitty corporations refusing to publish documentation and/or strategically abusing the legal system to stifle reverse engineering for interoperability.