• Durotar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    264
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    His plane has crashed and he’s on the passenger list, but it’s not proven yet that he was on the plane. He’s the person, who faked his death in the past.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, am I reading this right that the plane was shot down by russian air defence? If this is backed up at all by anything like a russian source, then this will just further enforce option that russia can not be trusted to do anything it says and that putin is weak and threatened (both are true but I thought the kremlin would at least try to say/show otherwise).

    How does russia keep messing up this bad? I am constantly shocked and awed.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, a pointless one that makes them look like predictable idiots. Most will not be unhappy at his death and those that would be are on russia’s side of this conflict. This (if it is what it looks like now) is like making a martyr just for assholes.

          • Elroy_Berdahl@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Putin is killing people and the purpose of the window assassinations is meant to be clearly not an accident. The whole point is to send a message, not to try and fool people.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If this is backed up at all by anything like a russian source

      The Guardian is reporting this:

      The cause of the crash was not immediately clear, but Prigozhin’s longstanding feud with the military and the armed uprising he led in June would give ample motive to the Russian state for revenge. Media channels linked to Wagner quickly suggested that a Russian air defence missile had shot down the plane.

      https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2023/aug/23/russia-ukraine-war-live-updates-drones-downed-moscow#top-of-blog

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I am hoping we get more info from anyone else then Wagner group soon.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am lost and this is a reply to my own statement. May I ask you to expand on what a “lib” is, how I erred to be labelled as one, and finally how it is you think I care about aesthetics?

        • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can’t speak for anyone else but I may be able to answer this.

          A lib is a liberal, someone who is pro-capital, not an anti-capitalist (very little overlap with how liberal tends to be defined in ordinary language in the US). Optics, relating to how people see the event, is idealism not materialism. Liberalism is idealist, unlike Marxism, which is materialist.

          The dig at liberalism and aesthetics is likely a critique of the implication that what this looks like has much to do with the material reality. That’s an aesthetic argument. It doesn’t matter what this looks like because the optics don’t affect the material relations. Someone who elevates the optics at the expense of the material relations is making an idealist, likely a liberal argument.

          Hence the comment embodying an aesthetic argument of the kind that liberals often make.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok, thank you, but what in my comment was at the expense of the material relations?

            • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re welcome. I’m glad you’re taking this in the spirit in which it’s intended. When Marxists criticise idealism, the target is the liberal world outlook, not the individual.

              By implication, really. Focusing on what people think of Russia’s/Putin’s trustworthiness rather than on it’s record or the factors that would keep it honest, so to speak. It’s Ukraine that violated Minsk, apparently prompted by France, Germany, and ‘NATO’. Looking at the optics, that seems a little more duplicitous than assassinating someone who attempted a coup (if this was an assassination and if what happened before can be called a coup).

              Would I trust a single person, e.g. Putin to uphold an international agreement? It doesn’t matter. It’s not a one-man show. War is expensive and the longer it goes on for the more expensive it becomes, in support as well as the cost of arms, soldiers, etc.

              Nobody has to trust Putin. An agreement would be maintained because material factors require it to be maintained. What westerners think it’s by-the-by. (I’m assuming you’re not Russian as you were asking about Russian sources—I’m not asking you to confirm or deny as I don’t want you to dox yourself; I’m just trying to give an answer that makes sense from the available evidence.)

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Please guide me on this, other wise these are just vague statements that make us both look silly.

            • khannie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re pissing in the wind trying to get anything from a Tankie unfortunately.

              Jumps in, stirs shit, refuses to elaborate, leaves.

      • demlet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dunno, this seems good for Putin to me. But I’m not an expert in geopolitics and war…

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh, it’s debatable. He had already shipped Wagner off to Belarus and folded the Wagner troops into the Belarus military, so Wagner was pretty effectively de-fanged at that point. The only thing Putin gained by this was sending a message to anyone else that decided to stand up to him, although if anyone still didn’t understand that Putin tends to assassinate people who displease him they haven’t been paying attention since like 1980 when Putin was still actually KGB. This is very on brand for Putin, although it is a bit novel to apparently go with airplane “crash” rather than his usual standbys of poisoning, “falling” out of windows, or tripping down flights of stairs/elevator shafts and landing on bullets.

          On the other hand, it does make Putin look scared and weak that he felt the need to assassinate someone who he had already effectively defeated, without needing to fire a shot at that. I still wonder how he pulled that off. He must have either had some seriously damning dirt on Prigozhin, or else made him one hell of a deal to get him to about face and march right out of Russia. Maybe Putin just straight up threatened to nuke him if he got any closer to Moscow and he decided not to try to call Putin’s bluff.

  • eyy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a disappointing guy. The least he could have done was take out Putin before he died.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m fully expecting Russian media to explain how those evil Ukranians sneaked a missile battery or a fighter jet into Moscow airspace and shot down a plane that just happened to contained Putin’s mortal enemies.

  • Echo71Niner@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never discount that a deal was reached and this was their way or his way of going in retirement with a new identity - faked death.

  • Emu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m loving all the tankie tears in here. They don’t know who to support. LOL. I love how ruZZia is slowly eating its own tail and destroying itself, just typical of a fascist state. Slava Ukraini! Slava NATO!

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I just think it’s amusing how easily they out themselves as kneejerk anti-west reactionaries with support of Russia, which is a country even more opposed to their alleged ideals.

    • EuthanatosMurderhobo@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know what tankies you’ve seen, lil fasc, but it was always understood among us that Prigozhin was only useful as long as he was under control. An ancap with a personal army running around unchecked isn’t something you’ll catch me supporting. I just wish this was done more effectively, without loosing control of the orchestra.

    • ClumZy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hexbear be like. The terminally online left makes me ashamed to share leftist sensibilities. Say what you want but political opponents don’t “dissapear” in the West. We’re fascists maybe, but the lesser evil atm. Once Putin (who let me remind you all has access to nukes) is done for, we can talk about NATO.

  • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Only thing I am seeing on this is that two of Wagner’s private jets were in the air, and one crashed over St. Petersburg while taking off from Moscow.

    The other jet that belongs to him turned around and landed in Moscow airport after losing contact with the first. Which is pretty strange.

    It is assumed that The leader Prigozhin and his 2nd in command were supposedly on board. As Russia state media is claiming they are dead.

    However, Russia State Media has been lying quite a bit though this war, so it has to be taken with a grain of salt.

    As of now 7 10 bodies have been found.

    However, just day’s earlier, Prigozhin was seen in Africa as if “announcing their services” to a developing situation. So why did he suddenly end up in Moscow? The one place he knows he isn’t safe?!

    Edit:
    2:24pm
    Wagner’s media is also claiming they both died.